Yehoodi
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2008
- Messages
- 767
- Reaction score
- 121
You don't understand prosecution very well then. It can be difficult to get a conviction and conviction rates are like batting averages for these people. You won't make it very far as a prosecutor if you choose to let your personal opinion of innocence get in your way.
Hernandez might be in some serious trouble here, not because he murdered anyone (i'm assuming he didn't) but he might get in trouble for how much he knew prior to when the police came knocking.
These guys who tried to get away from Hernandez house look really guilty right now, if they are, it becomes a matter of how much Aaron knew; these guys are probably his friends and if he tried to hide them in his house, that might result in jail time and even more likely - a suspension from our overzealous commissioner.
yes but its your personal opinion on the legality of the crime that is important . . . and for the sake of discussion I think the poster meant your personal legal opinion on the guilty or innocence of the defendant . . .
your not going to help your "batting average" as you called it if you try to prosecute someone and come to find out the judge allows a required finding of not guilty (at the close of the Commonwealth's case) , or it is found on appeal that the a required finding should of been allowed . . .
you are not going to look good among your peers (on all three parts of the legal system - defense-judge-DAs) if you have a number of those on your resume . . .
so it is best not to prosecute when there is no evidence, both from the binding ethical requirement but also from your resume position . . .











