Ice_Ice_Brady
where black is the color where none is the number
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2006
- Messages
- 27,041
- Reaction score
- 53,416
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Hopefully this means no more 2 yard draw plays to Woodhead in 3rd and 6.
Washington average less yards per carry last year than Woodhead.
Punt Returning 2012
Leon Washington (41 returns)
356 yards (Long: 52)
8.7 YPR
0 TDs
Julian Edelman (17 returns)
263 yards (Long: 68)
15.5 YPR
1 TD
Wes Welker (25 returns)
243 yards
9.7 YPR (Long: 31)
0 TDs
Wow - - this guy sure is admired by Seahawk fans.
I think we will really like this addition!
Seahawks.NET - The Voice of the 12th Man! • View topic - Leon Washington to NE Patriots
Or 25 yards on a 3rd and 14...
or 19 yards on 3rd and 17...
EDIT:
[with herculean strength of will I am deleting the expletive that I originally wrote in this spot]
2 plays. Cool. You've really picked a good sample size in proving me wrong about how ineffective Woodhead draw plays are.
That's irrelevant to what I said as I never even hinted at the opinion Washington draw plays > Woodhead draw plays. My point was if Woodhead is gone we know for sure the Woodhead draw plays that go nowhere are gone to. Hopefully they won't be replaced by ineffective draw plays with Washington.
And I wasn't presenting my "imaginary sample size" as a serious argument like you were.Twice the imaginary sample you gave.
what a depressing signing. of all the things we address it's f'n KR? that should be almost the last thing we finish up esp since you can get UDFA to do that crap. go get us our defensive and WR help before mucking around with this **** Bill
This means either Demps or Woodhead are gone. I'd guess Demps just on the fact that Woodhead has played and is valuable on 3rd down.
what a depressing signing. of all the things we address it's f'n KR? that should be almost the last thing we finish up esp since you can get UDFA to do that crap. go get us our defensive and WR help before mucking around with this **** Bill
This means either Demps or Woodhead are gone. I'd guess Demps just on the fact that Woodhead has played and is valuable on 3rd down.
what a depressing signing. of all the things we address it's f'n KR? that should be almost the last thing we finish up esp since you can get UDFA to do that crap. go get us our defensive and WR help before mucking around with this **** Bill
This means either Demps or Woodhead are gone. I'd guess Demps just on the fact that Woodhead has played and is valuable on 3rd down.
And I wasn't presenting my "imaginary sample size" as a serious argument like you were.
I also don't get how 3rd and 19 has anything to do with 3rd and 6 given that the defense has a much different look in each scenario, so your sample really didn't do anything to address what I said
| 11 | 591 |
| 23 | 1K |
| 5 | 3K |
| 8 | 800 |
| 10 | 1K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
June 5 - June 20 (Through 26yrs)











