So while its not a given that any rookie was going to come in and significantly contribute at OLB we are perfectly OK with expecting a rookie to protect out Franchise's blind side?
No one expects a rookie to come in and contribute on all 3 downs at OLB. It is reasonable however to expect one (if you pick a player for his pass rushing skills) to still be able to pin his ears back on third down and get after the passer.
Nope who who thinks Solder will be a starter? He will sit as a backup and learn if the off season is lost. That is why you take the guy who need some strength and technique development but has the best upside and could be in place for 10 years.
Do you think BB MIGHT have considered the implications of the loss of the off season and how it affects what you can expect from rookies? And perhaps influences how selections were made?
The D will be much better this year due to the youngsters having a year of experience and the jump from the first to second year. And of course the return of starters who were in IR last year.
I never do mocks. I don't study film of college players. I use the draft to understand who BB views the team. What we learned is that he thinks the pass rushers are already on the roster.
This d will be much better next year. I would have thought more people understood that a D has to play together regardless of the talent and that the talent can take a year or two to develop.
Think Cunningham will be better/smarter next year?
Deaderick?
Fletcher?
McCourty?
Spikes?
Think adding Warren, Bodden, Stroud and even Brace will heap the D next year?
My guess is the 2 rookies will be healthier than Morris and Taylor.....
This draft was never about short term solutions for this season, the labor dispute insures that.