hambone1818
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2007
- Messages
- 1,631
- Reaction score
- 1,023
Because his team sucked ass even more the year before, and he's led the team to more wins this season than in the previous 3 years combined?
I wouldn't vote for him, but an argument can be made.
Stop me when you find a good win in here:
Arizona (L)
Oakland (L)
Washington (W)
Seattle (W)
Detroit (L)
San Diego (W)
Tampa Bay (L)
Carolina (W)
San Francisco (L)
Atlanta (L)
Denver (W)
Arizona (W)
New Orleans (L)
Kansas City (L)
San Francisco (W)
Seattle (week 17)
I mean, come on...who the hell has STL beaten? I guess San Diego is a decent win, but after that? A bunch of NFC West drek and pretty much all the other bad teams in the NFL. They lost by 2 TD's at home against KC, got killed in NO, Atlanta beat them by 17 points in STL and they lost to TB in a close game against another overrated team.
In addition, they've drafted 15th, 13th, 2nd, 2nd and 1st in the last 5 years...at some point all that young talent could just blossom, it might not take a genius coach to turn them into a mediocre team.
Another thought: if the Pats win and the Rams lose next weekend then the Patriots would have 4 more wins than last year, the Rams 6. Considering how difficult it is in today's NFL to be truly 'great' vs. getting to merely mediocre, I'd consider the 14-2 record (against the opponents the Pats have played) more impressive than getting to 7-9 against many of the NFL's worst teams.
Last edited: