We're addressing a couple of different issues.
QUESTION ONE
Will Gronkowski be 100% or near 100% the week he is activated to play?
QUESTION TWO
Is Gronkowski healthy enough to play and not be anymore an injury risk than anyone else?
To be clear 20% of Gronk is a better starting TE than the alternatives. For me, the first question is irrelevant unless we compare with the alternatives.
And yes, the closer to 100% a player is/feels, arguably the less prone to injury. Of course, with this approach, a player may never come back. ANd certainly, players wouldn't play with injuries. Clearly, playing with injuries is part of the game.
MY CONCLUSIONS
A) This seems a mental issue to me. However, I would certainly have a different view if Gronk's non-team doctor was advising him to try to stay out.
B) Many players want to play whenever they can convince the doctor that they are OK. I'm glad that we don't have that situation (the RGIII situation I think).
C) So, considering that Gronk is our 2nd best offensive player (by far), he gets special treatment. Others might be told to suck it up and play; players play injured all the time. The team should be clear with Gronk that he is getting special treatment because of his value to the team.
D) I think that Gronk would be playing if this game was the SB, and probably if it were a playoff game.
E) Most of us thought that Game 6 was reasonable from the start, but that limited practice was preferable to PUP; and that besides, there could be a possibility that he could return earlier.
BOTTOM LINE
Players are "day-to-day" as long as they can walk into practice. Gronk has been no exception.
How about right now as well. RGIII certainly doesnt look "ready" or the same athlete from last year.