Cassanova792
Practice Squad Player
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2007
- Messages
- 171
- Reaction score
- 0
I felt that 2010 was a year that Manning actually deserved the award unlike about 2-3 of his four actual wins. That Colts' team sucked and Manning carried it to 10 wins and without him they would have been close to the 2-14 team that they were the following year without him. The 2010 Colts was Manning, Freeney, Mathis, Wayne, Clark, and mostly JAGs (some with big names) for the rest of the roster.
The years Brady deserved the MVP and didn't win include 2005 and especially 2006 where he didn't have have much talent around him anywhere. You can argue he deserved it last year, but it was hard to take it away from Rodgers.
They were 2-14 without him because the Colts organization did not have the foresight to get a competent QB. Curtis Painter, Dan Orlovsky and grandpa Kerry Collins are beyond dreadful. This years Colts team aside from the QB might be worse than the 2011 team. Consider, their head coach has cancer, they no longer have Pierre Garcon and Wayne is a year older as well as most of the O-talent are rookies. Though Luck WILL be a good QB in the future once he gets more experience under his belt, this year he is playing mediocre but still manages to get the colts to a 7-4 record.
Last edited: