I think one of the most overused phrases around draft time is “Generational Talent”. To me, the meaning should be self evident- you are All Decade team type player- one of the top 2-3 players at your position for a decade.
I started having this debate last year with local friends about Marvin Harrison Jr.- who was the generational talent flavor of the day. I was saying, I am not sure how much better he is than Odunze or Nabers. I don’t see a world where he is better than Jefferson or Chase. If he flourishes and equals Nakua or AJ Btown, that makes him a great player, but like the 3rd-5th best receiver in the league.
So, I can see looking at Travis Hunter and if you believe he can dominate on both sides of the ball- that would be generational. But I don’t see him as generational on offense or defense. Excellent, yes, but not generational. I think he is only generational if he excels on both sides.
I can see if you really think that Abdul Carter is like Micah Parsons or prime Von Miller, that is generational.
To me, if you think a QB prospect is generational, you should be slotting them between Mahomes and Allen/Lamar Jackson. Those are the current generational talents.
Matt Stafford is not and never was. Big Ben was not- he was behind Brady and Manning. Joe Burrow is not, to me. He is very good, but he does not stand above others in his generation. He is an All Pro talent- but not generational.
But, I realize, I might just be old and cranky. I ask you, wise Draft Forum, what does generational talent mean to you.