BradyManny
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2006
- Messages
- 11,103
- Reaction score
- 1,520
Sentence two. The catch would have been all the more important for the very fact that there is no way anyone can reasonably say that Welker "should have made" the catch. It would have been an over-the-top, almost miraculous catch made by a great player in his prime; the kind of catch that immortalizes the legacy of a great player and is the top of his "highlight reel" for decades to come.
Ugh, I hate to relive this. Second post today on this play. But I think, if you're feeling masochistic, you should rewatch this play again.
What difficulty there was in that catch owes some part to Welker's route and inability to transition to the back shoulder. He had ample time to adjust the route to be run less inside - and to transition to get on his back shoulder to make that in stride. That ball was in the air plenty of time. He slowed down, was slow to turn, and didn't jump high enough - and yet even then, once the ball hit his hands, he still should've had it.
That said, Brady could've made the debate moot by throwing a strike right in there from the getgo. Brady made the original mistake. Welker should've been able to make up for it. He didn't. And I feel badly for both guys, who I know would trade their wealth and health to reverse the outcome of that play.
As I said in the other thread, I don't blame either guy, or that play for the loss. It's a convenient place to start when trying to think of how the game slipped away, but its not the reason we lost - and there are half a dozen other plays of equal importance that immediately come to mind. But let's not sugarcoat that play.
Last edited:












