- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 73,426
- Reaction score
- 116,139
Agree. It is more complicated than my simplistic view but IMO for healthy NFL players who are fully vax'd and have mild to no symptoms they should play and not go into protocol. That's really my only point.I hear you, but I think it’s more complicated than that.
Here’s an example : even though I personally hate hockey, it’s a cult here in Canada. Recently, there was an outbreak on a university campus in my province and my son had a game at the campus rink. Hockey can’t help itself. Cults rarely do. Province had to step in and cancel the game. The nfl is (obviously) bigger than NS minor hockey. Maybe authorities know people can’t stop themselves. Maybe govt officials felt that pushing back a few games gives them a better chance to mitigate a spreader even that could strain an already strained system ? I think pushing it back makes sense as being cautious doesn’t change much in this instance imo. Might « give a team more players », but playing on short week following balances that I’d think.












