Soliel
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2017
- Messages
- 4,806
- Reaction score
- 5,577
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.One: people at work are claiming it’s cheating to line up in a defense that no one has seen before. I’m not sure about this but guys are comparing it to that Baltimore game where certain alignments were quasi legal.
Two. They are also claiming that Brady’s legacy is harmed by winning?????
How’s that even possible? I’d have been happy with 6-3 pats and couldn’t be convinced that it harms brady to get more rings. It seems like utter non sense
You work at an LSD lab?One: people at work are claiming it’s cheating to line up in a defense that no one has seen before. I’m not sure about this but guys are comparing it to that Baltimore game where certain alignments were quasi legal.
Two. They are also claiming that Brady’s legacy is harmed by winning?????
How’s that even possible? I’d have been happy with 6-3 pats and couldn’t be convinced that it harms brady to get more rings. It seems like utter non sense
Two. They are also claiming that Brady’s legacy is harmed by winning?????
How’s that even possible? I’d have been happy with 6-3 pats and couldn’t be convinced that it harms brady to get more rings. It seems like utter non sense
Irsay's favorite meth labYou work at an LSD lab?
Start looking for a new job for your own sake.One: people at work are claiming it’s cheating to line up in a defense that no one has seen before. I’m not sure about this but guys are comparing it to that Baltimore game where certain alignments were quasi legal.
Two. They are also claiming that Brady’s legacy is harmed by winning?????
How’s that even possible? I’d have been happy with 6-3 pats and couldn’t be convinced that it harms brady to get more rings. It seems like utter non sense
Tomorrow's conversation at your work:One: people at work are claiming it’s cheating to line up in a defense that no one has seen before. I’m not sure about this but guys are comparing it to that Baltimore game where certain alignments were quasi legal.
Two. They are also claiming that Brady’s legacy is harmed by winning?????
How’s that even possible? I’d have been happy with 6-3 pats and couldn’t be convinced that it harms brady to get more rings. It seems like utter non sense
OMG. You can't post stuff like this without telling us where you work. You've generated a strong desire to avoid your organization's products/services.
For example, when a competitor comes out with a new product design that makes yours obsolete, does everyone at your company accuse them of unfair business practices?
Career Guidance
You would have a hard time avoiding Eaton Corp. products. Anything with a hydraulic valve in it. Superchargers etc. mainly, we make valves and gears
Oh heck, I know Eaton. Had a good colleague do some leadership development work for you, quite some time ago. Irish homebase, right?
(Big enough that the people in your office demonstrating no common sense probably can't do much harm!)
(contrasted to the rules for offense saying you have to have 7 men on the LOS and only 1 man can be moving and that can’t be in the forward direction).
To give the defense a ghost of a chance to stop anything.Football question for anybody who knows: what's the underlying logic for the offense formation strict rules listed above?
Tom Brady's legacy is hurt by winning?!?!?! That may be the single dumbest thing I have ever heard. Not even Cliff Kellerman would roll with that.
Other football leagues (Arena and CFL come to mind) allow an offensive player to be running forward at the snap. I think it looks strange since I am so used to not seeing it. I think it certainly helps the offense by giving that receiver a running start but it's a gimmick the NFL certainly doesn't need.Football question for anybody who knows: what's the underlying logic for the offense formation strict rules listed above?