maverick4 said:
Wrong about what? That Brady was the most hit in the league, with articles to back it up? That the Pats used shot gun over 50% of their plays, with articles to back it up? Meanwhile you have nothing except your self-proclaimed (and often wrong) expert eyes.
You've bveen wrong about everything in this thread. From your assertion that Brady is the most hit QB to the idea that the article supports this fallacy of yours. Its been pointed out that the article didn't include sacks or hurries.
Also, SFBs, I never said that the Patriots didn't use the shotgun more than 50% of the time. This is something else you've been wrong about. Every time you open your mouth in a rebuttle to me, you prove that you don't understand what is being said to you. And that includes your assertion that I have EVERY claimed to be an expert. BTW, if you want to boil it down, I'd be willing to bet that people would say you've been wrong signifcantly more than I have. But that is just semantics.
maverick4 said:
About a year ago I was already posting/criticizing how obvious it was that we used shot gun so much, and how much Brady was getting hit. Self-proclaimed experts/morons like yourself were dismissing it, since there weren't any stats for me to bring up, and because you simply weren't seeing it. Now, after I link articles posted by Mike Reiss, Football Insiders, and ESPN proving the Brady hits and the shot gun formations, and now you're dismissing these stats as meaningless, worthless.
Yes, You've been erroneously ranting about McDaniels worse than NEM ever did about Weiss. And, more people have told you that you were wrong than people were telling Nem that he was wrong.
The article posted by Mike Reiss only said that the Patriots were using the shotgun more than 50% of the time. It didn't go into how many times he was hit. Again, this is you making things up because you don't actually read what is said. You make assumptions about what is said. Hell, the ESPN article doesn't even describe how they got their numbers. And again, they don't define what a hit is. So, without that perspective, their numbers are worthless.
maverick4 said:
Basically, you're going to close your eyes and deny reality no matter what. It's funny how desperate you are to discredit a stat that very-easy-to-understand counts "hits on QB's while throwing". It's obvious no QB is going to get a simple tap from the defender while throwing, but keep going down that path of intellectual masturbation that the stat is ambiguous/meaningless, it's amusing to read.
Maverick, you shouldn't confuse myself with yourself. I don't go around making assinine claims about the offense and point to stats without putting them into perspective. The only person who is doing any intellectual mastuerbation is yourself. With your worthless undefined stats. BTW, for perspective, Brady threw the ball in 2006 and 2007 a total of 1094 times and was sacked 46 times. Palmer had 1095 attempts and was sacked a total of 53 times during the same span. Kurt Warner had 619 attempts while being sacked 34 times. McNair had 673 attempts and was sacked 25 times. It was already established that they didn't define what they considered a hit. But in all honesty, if you are throwing a temper tantrum over Brady getting hit an average of 43 times a season, or less than 3 times a game, then you have serious issues.... Well, I think we all knew that already, but this just confirms it even more.
Again, its about perspective. Something that you don't understand.
