PATRIOTS NEWS Tom Brady, NFLPA Granted 14-Day Extension To File Motion For Rehearing By Second Circuit Court

[Huckleberry1]

Re: defamation

I do not believe Brady will file a defamation suit. I doubt he is interested in being put under discovery.

The dorito dinks are a different story. I think we will see one from them, backed by the Patriots organization. I actually believe they have a much better shot at winning such a suit than Brady has at playing football in weeks 1-4.

I'm not sure but I don't think it would be a fear of discovery so much as it would be not wanting an ongoing distraction for the rest of his career.

 

[Huckleberry1]

She hasn't followed this anywhere near as closely as I have.

Why did Chin reference the Wells Report if the appeal was only about Goodell's powers?

Why can't you or any other Goodellbot answer that?

They are probably too busy testifying to the Supreme Court. I know it takes up most of my time.

 

[PatsWickedPissah]

I admit to using the Ignore thread feature. It's useful when the topic is not to your taste.
Never used Ignore user or whatever feature but I'm considering it now.
Problem being the replies to the ignored noise spewing moron with quotes.

 

[Huckleberry1]

Banned for what? Insecure people hitting a "report" button?

There is nothing worse than insecure people on a messageboard.

Could agree more. I have them in this order.

5-People who abuse animals

4-People who abuse women

3-People who abuse children

2-Kim Jong-un

1-insecure message board posters

 

[Rusty Griswold]

I'm not sure but I don't think it would be a fear of discovery so much as it would be not wanting an ongoing distraction for the rest of his career.

Currently, being called a liar and cheater by the leader of a multi-billion dollar operation will be and IS a distraction for his career.

I can always tell who lives in the Boston bubble and who doesn't.

 

[Rusty Griswold]

He knew Wells would be doing the dirty work for the commissioners office and not doing any sort of independent investigation, but then again why am I telling you, you already know all this because you know everything.


You THE MAN Rusty. If you don't believe me just ask yourself, you'll tell you.

That was just too long for me to read, so I didn't read it.

 

[Rusty Griswold]

You don't care but Brady does.

He won't want discovery. No way.

Does Goodell? Like I said, call his bluff.

 

[Rusty Griswold]

Could agree more. I have them in this order.

5-People who abuse animals

4-People who abuse women

3-People who abuse children

2-Kim Jong-un

1-insecure message board posters

It was just too long to read. Sorry. No one's time is as important as yours, Ivan.

 

[sb1]

There is not a single shred of evidence pointing toward any plan to deflate any football on January 15, 2015.
That is the day for which violations were fabricated.

If my nickname was "Speedy" when I was a kid, that is not evidence that I exceeded the posted speed limit on May 19, 2016. It is just an irrelevant factoid that can be brought up to confuse the feeble-minded.

The text messages suggest it could have been a regular practice by the team to manipulate air in footballs on any given game. That's what circumstantial evidence is, ,if A is happening then it could suggest B.

As for the nickname... same thing. I'm not talking about hard evidence just circumstantial.

So again, not exactly "NO evidence". I know if this was another team and I didn't know any better, my eyebrow would be raised if there was such text messages. I know the Patriots do not cheat so I think about this circumstantial evidence accordingly. But it's still evidence.

 

[Rusty Griswold]

Yes and the evidence is indeed circumstantial but it still qualifies as a lot more than quote "NO evidence whatsoever".

And the ruling matters, what the judges say doesn't. A judge can say whatever he or she wants in their court. Even if all 3 of those judges said "Haha Patsies are tainted 4 asterisks" it would be completely irrelevant because that is not how they ruled.

Well, ok, how about no hard evidence? Usually, only hard evidence that is what is worthy of a conviction, unless you're the entire Manitowoc County public servant group up in Wisconsin, trying to cover up a fraudulent conviction of Steve Avery in 1995.

 

[Rusty Griswold]

I keep seeing that there are more and more posts in this thread, and I keep thinking that maybe there is some news or other productive discussions go on.

But then I go here and read page after page of people exchanging pleasantries...

I think I've discovered the batch of big ego board bullies here. I guess it's a good thing to get them all out at once so I can see who is who.

Unbelievable.

 

[sb1]

Does Goodell? Like I said, call his bluff.

A dorito dink suit would do that.

Brady himself will not sue for reasons already stated.

 

[sb1]

I'm not sure but I don't think it would be a fear of discovery so much as it would be not wanting an ongoing distraction for the rest of his career.

Or both.

 

[Huckleberry1]

I can always tell who lives in the Boston bubble and who doesn't.

Me too. You can ask anyone, I knew that Palm Beach Pats Fan, Denver Patsfan, and Maine Pats Fan weren't in the Boston Bubble. I also knew Old Rover is old and that wicked pissah is wicked pissed. However I will admit that it took me a few days to realize that Deus Irae is THE GOD OF WRATH, but I figured it out after our first argument when my car broke down on the highway and girlfriend spontaneously combusted.

Oh, one last thing, but don't tell anyone






andy johnson isn't really "Andy Johnson"


Keep that on. the down low

 

[Rusty Griswold]

The text messages suggest it could have been a regular practice by the team to manipulate air in footballs on any given game. That's what circumstantial evidence is, ,if A is happening then it could suggest B.

As for the nickname... same thing. I'm not talking about hard evidence just circumstantial.

So again, not exactly "NO evidence". I know if this was another team and I didn't know any better, my eyebrow would be raised if there was such text messages. I know the Patriots do not cheat so I think about this circumstantial evidence accordingly. But it's still evidence.

I think he and I are talking about actual evidence. Do you just like to play contrarian to argue?

They have no case. We could do this to every single set of colleagues in any business in America, take out texts, remove contexts, not really know the tone of the texts, and frame people left and right. That's what Goodell did here.

That's why the report took 3 months. They had nothing, so they had to create something. When the Pats put up that counter-report within 24 hours of the Wells Report, that means they knew what Wells/Goodell/Pash were up to LONG before that report was done.

It's why they removed all of the context from around the text exchanges and WHY we never saw the Brady, McNally and Jastremski interviews in the Wells Report.

They didn't like their rational explanations, so they hid them from you and I.

Why bother playing semantics around evidence, when well know what went down here?

You're essentially saying what Goodell is hoping the average person or lawyer will regurgitate in a court room, hoping it sticks.

It's like you're aligning with what a dirty, disgusting attorney might do, but you're a Pats fan?

 

[Rusty Griswold]

Or both.

Exactly my point. Just who has more to lose here?

I can't imagine there is too much in Brady's personal life to be embarrassed about, but Goodell has a whole lot to lose, including the truth on Spygate, which much of that stuff would land him in jail for defrauding the NFL customer.

IMO, at the end of all of this, Brady has the leverage.

 

[Rusty Griswold]

Me too. You can ask anyone, I knew that Palm Beach Pats Fan, Denver Patsfan, and Maine Pats Fan weren't in the Boston Bubble. I also knew Old Rover is old and that wicked pissah is wicked pissed. However I will admit that it took me a few days to realize that Deus Irae is THE GOD OF WRATH, but I figured it out after our first argument when my car broke down on the highway and girlfriend spontaneously combusted.

Oh, one last thing, but don't tell anyone






andy johnson isn't really "Andy Johnson"


Keep that on. the down low

Still too long. My attention span is becoming shorter by the year.

 

[Huckleberry1]

Still too long. My attention span is becoming shorter by the year.

Well, at least you keep quoting them, that means you can hire someone to interpret them for you.

 

[Rusty Griswold]

Well, at least you keep quoting them, that means you can hire someone to interpret them for you.

Not quite there yet. Too many words.

 

[sb1]

I think he and I are talking about actual evidence. Do you just like to play contrarian to argue?

You said "No evidence" and I said that was not true.

Which it isn't. The end.