Second team all pro. He's made the pro bowl once since his rookie season. He ultimately wasn't a successful NFL CB, so given that's where he was drafted, the pick failed. He's had a nice career as a FS. But he's not an all-timer or a hall of famer. Good player (at FS) and by all accounts a great teammate and team leader. Probably has a future as a coach if he wants it. Three-time Super Bowl champion has a nice ring to it as well.
I'm not grading on an Isaiah Wynn curve... if I was then everyone else gets an A+. Strange didn't play well in the season opener, his first career start, but it counts. He's gotten better since and overall he's trending favorably. I think "outstanding" is overstating it a bit but I have him at above average (C+) right now and trending toward good (anywhere in the B range). It's a fluid grade, just like with every player as we get more data week to week.
Competition and results count for something, right? The team has two wins against two awful football teams with really bad defenses. Only one of their opponents so far (Green Bay) has a defense that doesn't suck. Cleveland's defense statistically isn't that good either however they have two players up front (Garrett and Clowney) who will put some pressure on the o-line to protect an inexperienced quarterback. If they can keep Zappe clean and maul Cleveland's poor run defense then it's another notch in their belt. That's fair, no?
I also don't think it's unusual for there to be a variance in grades. Of course not everyone is going to see everything in the same way. You seem to think I'm skewing my grades to fit some agenda... I could say the same for you suggesting Strange gets an A+ so far... but I really don't think that's what either one of us is doing. I'll allow for + or -5 biases on a scale of 1-100.