- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 15,404
- Reaction score
- 25,070
At 335, maybe he could back up Wilfork at NT.
He'd be a "quick" 335, too.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.At 335, maybe he could back up Wilfork at NT.
Vilma at safety? He's what 6' 225lbs?
I believe you've downplayed the weight difference between Vilma and Mayo. Vilma was 233 at the Combine, Mayo 242. Vilma was 6' 1/2", Mayo was 6' 1 1/4". 9 lbs and 3/4" larger suggests a little more of a frame for further bulking up.He played about about 233-235 with NYJ.
Mayo had maybe 5 pounds on him when they came out of college respectively.
I know that some of the guys I listed are more athletes than classic NE style LB's, but I feel like we are going to take what the draft has to offer with value, and honestly I don't see many natural 3-4 backers in this class. If we want one we have to go up and get Everette Brown, Maulauga or somebody really high. I'd rather take another S or CB and focus on securing the lines than go and get Connor Barwin with one of these aforementioned prospects likely to go 3 rounds later than Barwin.
Somebody disagreed with me earlier when I said we don't want to have to teach more DE converts to OLB. We don't have to teach all these kids to play LBer all over again, just teach them how to use their partially honed ball hawking skills to play our style LB.
Value wise, I am not sold on Barwin... does that mean any of these other guys are great fits? Not necessarily, but they are football players.
Though I'm still shopping for a young buck to pair inside with Mayo for the long term (Sintim this year or Norwood next year).
Wasn't Vilma a bust? Otherwise why did he get cut? I remember the main concern with Vilma was that he was too small to be a Pats linebacker. Why has that changed, unless he's gotten himself to the 240-245 lb range?
Vilma didn't get cut, he was traded to the Saints for conditional pick(s) (they were undisclosed at the time, and I don't know the details). He was a star in NY's 4-3 defense before Mangina arrived, but didn't have the size or skills to adopt to 3-4 ILB, so NY opted to trade him to a 4-3 team. I believe that the trade New Orleans made makes it difficult for them to resign him. He was also recently arrested for drunk driving.
Actually, what makes it difficult for the Saints to resign Vilma before he hits FA is the trade they made for Jeremy Shockey. If the Saints resign Vilma before FA begins, then they owe the JEST their 2009 second--which they already promised to the Gnats for Shockey. So if they resign Vilma before FA begins, they then owe a* first-round pick to the Gnats, but if they wait, they give the Gnats a second and the JEST a third.
*It's not entirely clear if it's a 2010 first or a 2009 first.
I thought AD was great at SILB in the start of 07 and that the run defense dropped considerably once Colvin got injured and everything changed. I like AD outside, too, but on the run-first kind of downs, I think he has a bigger impact inside.
.
I was thinking of this very thought earlier today.. I need to find the stats but moving AD outside caused the yards per rush to go up.
Just to clarify, AD going outside didn't cause the YPRush to go up, but the net of the move did, IE Colvin being replaced in the top 4 by increased playing time for Seau, etc. AD was fine at OLB. His replacement at ILB wasnt.
Vilma didn't get cut, he was traded to the Saints for conditional pick(s) (they were undisclosed at the time, and I don't know the details). He was a star in NY's 4-3 defense before Mangina arrived, but didn't have the size or skills to adopt to 3-4 ILB, so NY opted to trade him to a 4-3 team. I believe that the trade New Orleans made makes it difficult for them to resign him. He was also recently arrested for drunk driving.
I'll pass.
Since before the 2004 draft there's been someone telling us how great Vilma would be for NE, while BB would undoubtedly find a way to make use of the talent, it doesn't mean he's a great or even good fit for BB's defense.
The point was just made that Mangini allowed Vilma to seek a trade to anyone but NE - think about that, Vilma the superstar ILB was allowed to seek a trade! Forget the 'anyone but NE' window dressing. Mangini may be a lot of things, but he's a very good coach and if Vilma was that effective in his defense - NT or no NT (how about that David Harris?)- Mangini would have found a way to resolve any personality issues and keep Vilma.
Vilma is a smoke screen, talent is a must but it's the bright light both marking and concealing oncoming traffic - look beyond the light to find the mass that will run you over.
You listed Norris, a DE who needs to find a new position, surely he isn't the only player out there who lined up somewhere other than ILB in college who might be capable of learning to play ILB in the NE 3-4?While he may not be the best block-shedding 'backer in the game, I don't see any of those types available this offseason, who could presumably play ILB for us.
You listed Norris, a DE who needs to find a new position, surely he isn't the only player out there who lined up somewhere other than ILB in college who might be capable of learning to play ILB in the NE 3-4?
Now I'm confused, most of the kids you listed looked to be ILB types, what position are you drafting ILB or OLB or both?I'm not sure I had ILB in mind for Norris, as I would view him as more of an edge rusher ala the thread title "Mike Vrabel". I do think there are more transitional prospects, but once again they are either going to be taken really early (Everette Brown) or they are big question marks.
Which late round "value-picks" do you think could contribute for us at LB over the next year or two?
| 23 | 956 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 17 - May 2 (Through 26yrs)











