Twentytothree
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2008
- Messages
- 814
- Reaction score
- 896
Laser-timed 4.53 is probably faster than hand-timed 4.48.N’Keal Harry ran a 4.53 at the combine…. Just sayin’….
(ducks)
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Laser-timed 4.53 is probably faster than hand-timed 4.48.N’Keal Harry ran a 4.53 at the combine…. Just sayin’….
(ducks)
I think you're mixing concepts. Straight line speed in a testing environment shouldn't be given disproportionate weighting in how you evaluate a player because there is much more to being an NFL receiver than just that. But at the end of the day straight line speed is still one tool for guys to have in their tool box and 4.53 vs. 4.48, while small in absolute terms, does in fact speak to two players possessing that tool at different levels and it's a factor in their NFL projections. Not saying it's the holy grail to go off of, but it's absolutely a factor.If it is, it shouldn’t be
And that guy on film was special. The only alleged negative was possible lack of speed. Everyone knows he’s a special talent. I’ve wanted him at 4 (if Hunter was gone) for months. What people don’t realize is that 4.5 and under is fast, not blazing fast like Tyquan Thornton, but still fast.I think its crazy how a guy puts in a body of work for a whole season and just because he runs under 4.5 at his pro day he is suddenly a much better WR than he was 10 minutes ago when we didn't know his 40 time. Lol. He was falling into the deep teens and now some of you want him at 4. Its ridiculous. He is the same guy as on his film.
Tetairoa McMillan needs to be back in serious consideration for the Patriots. He’s got enormous potential as a WR1 for Drake Maye running like that at his size.
If you felt he was a stud before he ran that’s not what I’m referring to. I’m referring to thinking he’s a better player than before because of the timeThat's fair, but not sure that really characterizes what's happening with Tet. I think he's a guy who's tape and production have been discounted some because of a perception that he'll test slow so it won't translate. I think it's kind of the opposite of what you're saying. He's not being elevated above his production/tape because of his time here, it's the time here being respectable enough that it gives credibility to his tape/production. That's different than a guy who didn't produce or look good on tape getting elevated because they ran the 40 fast.
He was the only player that scared me when we played Atlanta in the SB. He was a BEAST!Jones was just big. Nothing about his game required him to be a contested catch guy. His route running was the elite of the elite. A real pleasure to watch him excite his craft the way he did
Getting in a sprinter stance and running 40 yards straight in shorts and a tee shirt 5/100s of a second faster on one given day is as close to meaningless as it gets. 0.05 over 40 yards = 16 inchesI think you're mixing concepts. Straight line speed in a testing environment shouldn't be given disproportionate weighting in how you evaluate a player because there is much more to being an NFL receiver than just that. But at the end of the day straight line speed is still one tool for guys to have in their tool box and 4.53 vs. 4.48, while small in absolute terms, does in fact speak to two players possessing that tool at different levels and it's a factor in their NFL projections. Not saying it's the holy grail to go off of, but it's absolutely a factor.
This is hilarious. You claim the guy is special on film and yet you claim there was a lack of speed. All you guys do is vomit back up the media crap you listen to. No on dares to be intelligent and actually watch the film. If they had, speed would not have been an issue. The tape is fine. Teams don't care about media opinion. Today changed nothing. Teams already have Tet graded based on film, not a late workout. At the end of the day, Tet is the 2nd best WR in the draft. He is still not ahead of Harrison, Nabers, Odunze, or Thomas from last year. This is a weak WR draft. The Pats are not picking Tet at 4. Its just not happening. He will fall into 10-20 range just like he has all along.And that guy on film was special. The only alleged negative was possible lack of speed. Everyone knows he’s a special talent. I’ve wanted him at 4 (if Hunter was gone) for months. What people don’t realize is that 4.5 and under is fast, not blazing fast like Tyquan Thornton, but still fast.
can we stop nitpicking.
This. Tet is usually open on almost every tape. The perception was that he would run a slow 40 and it would reveal that competition was why he was always winning.That's fair, but not sure that really characterizes what's happening with Tet. I think he's a guy who's tape and production have been discounted some because of a perception that he'll test slow so it won't translate. I think it's kind of the opposite of what you're saying. He's not being elevated above his production/tape because of his time here, it's the time here being respectable enough that it gives credibility to his tape/production. That's different than a guy who didn't produce or look good on tape getting elevated because they ran the 40 fast.
except its football, not track & field.4.48 vs. 4.53 is actually a pretty significant difference in the world of 40 times.
He actually ran like a 4.55, the 4.48 stuff is apparently BS4.48 vs. 4.53 is actually a pretty significant difference in the world of 40 times.
| 10 | 915 |
| 8 | 836 |
| 79 | 4K |
| 31 | 961 |
| 0 | 214 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 7 - April 22 (Through 26yrs)











