PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

So Michael Sam Is Gay, Who Cares? Can He Rush The QB?

Including the Pats.

This is nothing like Espn and the Tebow fanatics camped outside the gates of Gillette Stadium. Way more drama that a team like the Pats (who does not want to draw attention to itself) wants no part of. Belichick does not want to answer Sam questions the whole 2014 season.
You evidently didn't see Belichick handle the Tebow and Hernandez media situations. Let me describe for you those media situations: after the initial day, there were no media situations. In the event Sam becomes a Patriot, Bill Belichick won't "answer Sam questions the whole 2014 season.". Hell, he won't answer Sam questions beyond the first one asked of him. How anyone could possibly think otherwise is beyond me. No one (emphasis added) in the media determines what Bill does or doesn't answer. Bill does, and that's why those of us who dislike the media think Bill's great and it's also why the media dislikes Bill. Case closed,end of story.
 
Including the Pats.

This is nothing like Espn and the Tebow fanatics camped outside the gates of Gillette Stadium. Way more drama that a team like the Pats (who does not want to draw attention to itself) wants no part of. Belichick does not want to answer Sam questions the whole 2014 season.

Most overrated concern in football. The Pats didn't answer questions all year about Hernandez and ESPN and theTebow fanatics were not a distraction during the preseason and probably wouldn't have been if they kept Tebow into the season.

Hell, in San Diego, Manti Teo was supposed to be a distraction all year too and they had their best season in years.

Anyone who thinks the media is going to go the entire training camp and preseason and then go 17 weeks barraging the Patriots coaches and players with questions about Sam's sexuality every week is kidding themselves. Whatever team that drafts him will be the center of the media attention the first week of training camp and then the media interest will drop off. This isn't a story that has a lot of legs.
 
Just because it is your perspective does not mean I agree. I do not disagree that bigotry towards gay people is bigotry towards people in general, but that is not the subject of this thread.


I forgot your opinion is the only one that matters.
 
BTW, I have avoided this thread because I figured it would devolve which it did a bit. But good for Michael Sam. I have no problem with him being gay. I am happy for him that he doesn't have to hide it.

I am totally straight, but I would have no problem being in a locker room with a gay guy. Hell, I sure I have been plenty of time in the gym without knowing it. Considering the success rate I have had with women in my lifetime, I am sure that I am the last one a gay guy is checking out in the showers anyway.
 
And I wouldn't advocate taking children into a strip club anymore than I would taking them to a gay pride parade.

What if you took your young children to a Sox game on a Sunday family day at Fenway Park, and the Queer Eye for the Straight Guy cast were there to 'perform' for them?
 
What if you took your young children to a Sox game on a Sunday family day at Fenway Park, and the Queer Eye for the Straight Guy cast were there to 'perform' for them?

What's the big deal with that? I would have no problem with gay performers or gay people doing whatever it is that they want to do. I would be more concerned with the wicked drunk belligerent guy.

I am not worried about my children catching the "gay" They will be whatever it is that they will be, I just want them to lead a happy and fulfilling life.
 
What if you took your young children to a Sox game on a Sunday family day at Fenway Park, and the Queer Eye for the Straight Guy cast were there to 'perform' for them?

Posts like this make me consider moving to another country. Then, I remember that most people who think like you will soon be senile or dead and replaced with a far more educated, intelligent generation. Be happy that your kids and grandkids will live in a more enlightened society than you did. The day will come soon when it is just as shocking to react in a bigoted way to gay culture as it is to react that way to African-American culture.
 
I read this entire thread. For anyone picking it up from the very end, here's the summary:


PATS16N0: Modest gays are cool. Flaming gays are NOT cool!

PP2/BradyFTW: If you don't think gays are cool, you're just a bigot!

PATS16N0: <inserts gay pic>

Kontradiction: Homosexuality is not natural.

BradyFTW: Define natural.

Kontradiction: *something "grieving mother" something*

Joker: <inserts random gag , followed by a pearl of wisdom. then inserts another random gag, or 3>

AndyJohnson: Gays are cool.

condon84: Homosexuality is not natural.

BradyFTW: DEFINE NATURAL!!!

Uncle Meat: We're all going to die!

Nunchucks: No, we're not.

Uncle Meat: GTFO!

Nunchucks: I like something which rhymes with 'floral checks'.

lurker: *something "new husband kills kids" something*

fnordcircle: Do not use VPN at work..../jargon.

rclarr: <'like' every single post>


You should do this for every multipage cluster**** thread.
 
I read this entire thread. For anyone picking it up from the very end, here's the summary:


PATS16N0: Modest gays are cool. Flaming gays are NOT cool!

PP2/BradyFTW: If you don't think gays are cool, you're just a bigot!

PATS16N0: <inserts gay pic>

Kontradiction: Homosexuality is not natural.

BradyFTW: Define natural.

Kontradiction: *something "grieving mother" something*

Joker: <inserts random gag , followed by a pearl of wisdom. then inserts another random gag, or 3>

AndyJohnson: Gays are cool.

condon84: Homosexuality is not natural.

BradyFTW: DEFINE NATURAL!!!

Uncle Meat: We're all going to die!

Nunchucks: No, we're not.

Uncle Meat: GTFO!

Nunchucks: I like something which rhymes with 'floral checks'.

lurker: *something "new husband kills kids" something*

fnordcircle: Do not use VPN at work..../jargon.

rclarr: <'like' every single post>

I would start donating to the site--actually donating directly to you--if you would do this for every thread.
 
What if you took your young children to a Sox game on a Sunday family day at Fenway Park, and the Queer Eye for the Straight Guy cast were there to 'perform' for them?

What is wrong with that? You act as if they have an obligation to pretend they are like you.
I am pretty sure I would rather have my children model the character, integrity and personality of a person who treats ALL other with respect and sleeps with the same sex, that you who disrespects anyone not like you and sleeps with the opposite sex.
In either case they will end up with their own inborn sexual orientation but in one case they would be good human being who respect others and in the other they would be hateful jerks.
 
You and PP2 can't help but put words in my mouth. PP2 made the claim that gays are physically healthy. In general, the opposite is true because of their extremely high STD rate. So therefore you claim I'm saying blacks are unnatural? The discussion shifted away from "unnatural" to "health" by PP2 comments. And it should be obvious. When all else fails, make up arguments the other side is not claiming.

Gay individuals are physically healthy. There is nothing inherently gay about STDs and I can't understand how you're saying they're not healthy due to a disease that they have to catch.

African Americans suffer from high rates of sickle cell. Thus isn't even something they have to catch. Does it mean they are unnatural?

This distinction of yours is completely arbitrary,
 
Gay individuals are physically healthy. There is nothing inherently gay about STDs and I can't understand how you're saying they're not healthy due to a disease that they have to catch.

African Americans suffer from high rates of sickle cell. Thus isn't even something they have to catch. Does it mean they are unnatural?

This distinction of yours is completely arbitrary,

I think he is saying AIDS is Gods punishment for being gay.
 
What if you took your young children to a Sox game on a Sunday family day at Fenway Park, and the Queer Eye for the Straight Guy cast were there to 'perform' for them?
As a former Sox season ticket holder, I'll tell you what: take your "chilluns" to the bleachers on Family Day, or any other day, and you'll see people "perform" in a manner which will have you begging for "Queer Eye..."
 
Probably THE definitive 2008 explanation of homosexuality within the human species....

I was born gay. Aliens manipulating sexuality. - David Icke's Official Forums

" 27-11-2008, 05:18 AM #4
los_nomo


Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 754

Default
I'm not gay, but at least 3 kids on my block were gay so I can see where you are coming from. Oddly enough I contibute this to cartoons where characters like Bugs Bunny, Elmer Fudd, Daffy Duck and Yosemite Sam etc.. would spontaneously change into cross dressing drag queens and take on the role of the submissive female types.


So, it was Foghorn Leghorn engaging in gay bdsm with that dog that did it...yup, I'm convinced now...

 
I also want to point out that if Sam is a good teammate and contributing player, I'd play alongside him with no problems if I were a player. That's what it comes down to.

I asked in the other thread and you did not answer.
Does being a good teammate include not acting gay?
Every lockerroom I have ever been in, sex is a huge topic of conversation.
So if Sam is doing like the straight players and talking about sex, telling stories, etc, does that make him a bad teammate?
If he openly discusses his gayness, just as straight players openly discuss their sexual proclivities, is he still a good teammate?
If he brings a date to a party at your house and makes out with them, while straight players are doing the same, is he still a 'good teammate'?
 
Small pox was god's punishment of the Native Americans for being on OUR land.

I seem to remember reading that the Army helped it along by giving them blankets with the smallpox virus on them.
 
You and PP2 can't help but put words in my mouth. PP2 made the claim that gays are physically healthy. In general, the opposite is true because of their extremely high STD rate. So therefore you claim I'm saying blacks are unnatural? The discussion shifted away from "unnatural" to "health" by PP2 comments. And it should be obvious. When all else fails, make up arguments the other side is not claiming.

You claim that gays are not mentally and physically healthy because they have a high rate of STDs.

Black men also have a disproportionate rate of STDs.. does this mean they are also mentally and physically unhealthy?

If you answer no, then you are obviously biased towards gays.

If you answer yes, then you would be erroneous. According to the CDC, the health of black men is not significantly different than the health of the average man.
 
Wash rinse repeat.

I guess you're talking about yourself.

The perspective that homosexuality is 'unnatural' that you, boogs, kontradiction and others have put forth is a very poor argument because a great deal of civilization is "unnatural" if we were to follow that line of thinking.

Were "natural" to be equated with "what is right," and "unnatural" equated with "what is wrong" then all of us were wrong the day we put on clothes because no other animals do that. No other animals drive cars, watch tv, or play football.

And invoking the bible in a literal fashion is pretty silly because if we were to take it literally, the entire NFL would have to be put to death for working on the Sabbath, according to Moses.
 
MORSE: Patriots Rookie Mini Camp and Signings
Patriots News 05-10, Patriots Rookie Minicamp Starts
MORSE: Way Too Early 53-man Roster Projection
Several Remaining Patriots Free Agents Still Seeking Homes
ESPN Insider on Patriots A.J. Brown Trade: ‘I Think He Knows Where His Future is Headed’
Former Patriots Staffer Reveals Surprising Person Behind Two Key Player Cornerstone Additions in 2021
Patriots News 05-03, A.J. Brown Concerns, Vrabel’s Saga
MORSE: Clearing the Notebook from the Patriots Draft
What Does An Early Look At The Patriots’ 53-Man Roster Prediction Look Like?
MORSE: Final Patriots Draft Analysis
Back
Top