Mack Herron
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2006
- Messages
- 16,604
- Reaction score
- 23,611
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.great visualThe problem with that strategy is that Julio Jones is a large, powerful human. Faulk and Marvin Harrison were finesse players. Julio is too strong to jam consistently without risking him tearing the cornerbacks arms off and catching the pass with those arms instead of his own. Would Rowe, for instance, have the ability to jam Jones at the line and stay with him?
Based on their season thus far wether they win or lose..Jones gets his unless he's completely off or Ryan is completely off.
The variable that seems to fluctuate in falcons wins and losses is Coleman /Freeman/ Sanu and Gabriel receiving stats.
If you look at his receiving yards for this season, in Julio Jones' five most productive games (300, 174, 139, 135, 113 yards) the Falcons are 1-4.
You can let him have his yards, especially if Ryan starts to over-rely on him, and still find ways to win.
The problem with that strategy is that Julio Jones is a large, powerful human
You aren't jamming him to hold him there. You are jamming him in order to throw off TIMING.
The Faulk rules were because in film study they realized the offense, reads and timing flowed through Faulk. They hit him to disrupt the timing and it worked for about a half.
The fact that Jones is bigger actually makes it easier to get a jam on him than a small quick guy.
In this case you aren't playing bump and run you are playing bump and double.
I like the idea.
The other problem with it - they motion the heck out of him to prevent just such a strategy. It's probably in the bag of tricks over the course of a game - not sure it's an all-game long thing though.
This. Possession time is what will win us the game, I don't like our chances in a shootout, I'm sure our team will be prepared well, and the run game needs to be held in check while we need to also be physical with their receivers, knock them around, hit them hard and put them on notice that if they going to catch the ball that they are going to be hit hard.
Overall we need to keep their running backs inside and also keep Matt Ryan in check because we know he likes to run the ball time to time.
If we take away Julio and their running game then it's gonna be tough of them.
I have faith in Rowe and Ryan being able to keep their other receivers in check. We will definitely have to double up on Julio because he is a huge guy, not a speedster but can go up and get it and he has the size advantage over Butler.
If we win this game is because of our defense.
Our front 7 will need to have the game of their lifetime, also some of these guys being in the SB 2 years ago will help the newer guys get ready. It's always hard for a guy to handle all the pressure in their 1st SB appearance...
Our d-line has been solid and having a healthy Hightower going into this game is gonna be a huge thing for us. Also Van Noy and McLellin being solid 2nds on this team is helpful. Those guys gonna be the key to keep their running backs in check.
On the surface you may call me crazy but please give this theory a shot as I think it is a realistic strategy that may work.
- Give Them Julio Jones....take everyone else aways-
If you look up and crunch some numbers on the falcons seasons, specifically in terms of the offense..you'll see Jones production for a large part doesn't change wether the falcons win or lose. On the other hand: Games where Sanu and Gabriel struggle...the falcons lose. The games where the 2 do well..They win.
Same thing with the running backs...games where falcons lost for the most part, they had little impact through the air..games they won they got plenty of looks and were productive .
I think concentrating on just taking away Jones may be a fatal error. The ends and linebackers will have to marshall faulk the backs..stick Butler on Sanu and let the rest fall into place.
Jones is going to make big catches wether you try to take him away or not...but stats show he isn't the x factor in winning and losing.
Just my very amateur point of view.
Go Pats!
Interesting detail. In the wins Jones gets fewer catches and yards but more TDs....
In Atlanta's losses this season, Julio Jones averages 7.4 catches, 125.4 yards, 0.4 TDs.
But in Atlanta's wins, Jones averages just 5.5 catches, 93.5 yards, 0.6 TDs
...
Hey all,
Belichick and Patricia are both known to like to take away your primary weapons. Obviously this means Julio Jones and the passing attack more generally. However, my question is to what degree we are willing for Atlanta to gain rushing yards if it means shutting down the Atlanta passing attack.
For instance, do we run sets with two offensive linemen or fewer to help us with zone and man to man? Are we willing to give up 200 yards on the ground if it means slowing down the Atlanta passing game?
I'd play lots of dime in this game with a 2-3-6 if it means forcing Atlanta to try to win in a manner different than they are accustomed. Thoughts on this "dare them to run" approach?
I thought it was interesting that the approach against the Steelers was to not blitz and play 6-7 in coverage, allowing us to smother A Brown and force Big Ben to dissect us with a young wr corps. It worked beautifully, despite Ben playing well. Now Bell was out, but DeAngelo is still a very good rb
Now Ryan is not Ben, he doesn't handle pressure as well, but he has Julio and 2 rb's that can make plays. I think we'll see more blitzes depending on the Falcons sets, but i expect 6-7 in coverage again and force them to beat us with the run.
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 6 - April 21 (Through 26yrs)











