Lansdowne
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2005
- Messages
- 4,390
- Reaction score
- 1,429
I feel bad for Jets fans (for once)
imagine if one of our guys jumped over to the Jets outta nowhere. I'd be hurt too
Been there, done that.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I feel bad for Jets fans (for once)
imagine if one of our guys jumped over to the Jets outta nowhere. I'd be hurt too
I feel bad for Jets fans (for once)
imagine if one of our guys jumped over to the Jets outta nowhere. I'd be hurt too
Great pickup for you guys. Devastated that this happened though, he deserved better from the Jets.
I feel bad for Jets fans (for once)
imagine if one of our guys jumped over to the Jets outta nowhere. I'd be hurt too
Just curoius but what guys are you talking about that are 'way better than 85 has ever been'?
I feel bad for Jets fans (for once)
imagine if one of our guys jumped over to the Jets outta nowhere. I'd be hurt too
Love this pickup. Ellis has been making life miserable for us for the last 10 years. Great to have him aboard. :rocker:
uh, no. Not one bit. Especially since they basically gave him a complete joke of an offer, vet min. To be quite honest, I hope he only has two GREAT games, 10/9 and 11/13.
OK. First, if we play a 43 instead of a 34 one of the OLBs becomes a DE, and we would only have, at most 3 traditional DL type guys on the field.
Second, 52 or 51? Really? When is the last time an NFL team played that?
Abd 90% of non goalline? We were in nickel/dime 57% of the time last year.
I agree DaBruinz, too early for anyone to give up on Brace, he's showed some flashes and he provides great depth.
He played well when he was on the field last season.Flashes? Really? Who was he flashing?
He actually got in some games last year but that hardly constitutes a flash. And he seemed to have a new attitude toward cheeseburgers this off season. So who knows but I did not see any flashes.
A nickel would be a 4 man front. But we aren't going to play 5 man fronts. You said OVER 90% of our snaps would be in a 43, 52, 51. That would not be nickel, so we essenital would not have a nickel or dime package if what you said we correct. Perhaps I misunderstood. Again, though, we won't be lining up a 5 DL formation excpept in short yardage/goalline.I'm guilty of typing that too fast. 434, 425, 416, 515, 524, 605, 506 - basically all of the non 3-4 defenses are going to as a group be played more then the 3-4 IMO.
I'm not sure how you are counting traditional OLB's - but if Cunningham has his hand down more then half the snaps, then he's functioning as a DL.
Why does playing a nickel or dime preclude a 4 man DL front? At the moment the team is deepest in the secondary and the DL, why wouldn't BB entertain using less LB's this year then the recent past?
$4M for one year is double the amount I would've offered him. That is very serious over-payment.
There goes whatever cap space we might've had.