PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Rookie Numbers Released

Status
Not open for further replies.
pats1 said:
Again, they're NUMBERS!

I see where you're coming from, but I just don't get how 39 is any less "tight" (as THEARCHIVES put it) than any other number. It really doesn't matter. They don't make any players look better or whatever. All that matters is the player wearing the number. This whole "tight" number thing stikes me as if it was coming from casual, younger football fan, turned on by the flashiness of T.O. or Chad Johnson and his celebrations. They probably pick up a ball and try to figure out their best celebration and pick their "tightest" number instead of actually focusing on the aspects of the game that will make them better.
Sorry, pats1, but you're being sane. We'll have none of that here!
 
Are these numbers tight???

Where is ARCHIVES???

If he's not happy...i am not happy....I want tight or nothing.
 
pats1 said:
No, 85, 88, and 89 were still available.

There just seems to be in an influx with young WR's taking numbers in the teens lately.

Chris Henry on the Bengals - 15
Mark Bradley on the Bears - 16
Matt Jones on the Jaguars - 18
Ernest Wilford on the Jaguars - 19
Reggie Williams on the Jaguars - 11

Even some vets take these teen numbers when they switch teams:

Plaxico Burress on the Giants - 17
Jerry Rice on the Broncos before his retirement - 19
Tim Dwight on the Jets - 17
Andre' Davis on the Bills - 18
Corey Bradford on the Lions - 17

So they use the other teen numbers, too.
17 just more frequent.
Thanks Pat1
 
HOLY F*CK!! 39?!?!

Kill me now...

You better change your damn number Maroney before the season starts.
 


This thread is hilarious.

Anyway, Jackson's seem to be his choice (1+7=8), and although #39 may not be all that "tight," I think Maroney can make it work.

Anyway, glad the great numbers drama is over.
 
pats1 said:
No, 85, 88, and 89 were still available.

There just seems to be in an influx with young WR's taking numbers in the teens lately.

Chris Henry on the Bengals - 15
Mark Bradley on the Bears - 16
Matt Jones on the Jaguars - 18
Ernest Wilford on the Jaguars - 19
Reggie Williams on the Jaguars - 11

Even some vets take these teen numbers when they switch teams:

Plaxico Burress on the Giants - 17
Jerry Rice on the Broncos before his retirement - 19
Tim Dwight on the Jets - 17
Andre' Davis on the Bills - 18
Corey Bradford on the Lions - 17

If jackson wanted an eight I would think double eight, 88, would have been his choice.
 
zippo59 said:
What? He only had one season where he went over 1000 yards, and during that one year he only averaged 3.8 yards per carry.

Says someone who obviously wasn't around to watch the '70's Pats. His backup, Don Calhoun, ran for over 700 yds in '76, '77, &'79. They used two backs in those days as well, so Andy Johnson ran for 5-700 yds. those years as well. I think we still hold the record for team rushing yds in Sams only 1000 yd season( and these were 14 game seasons). This guy probably thinks B Bonds HR record is for real!
 
Last edited:
Numbers in sports have always been important and will always be important. Maroney talks about making his own legacy. I am happy to see him take #39. Maybe he can make that number as "cool" as Earl Campbell and other great backs made their numbers. Then in the end, if it gets retired, #39 would honor him and Sam Bam, who was a great Patriot in his own right and one of the greatest and most important college players in history. It was Sam's monster game for USC against Alabama that desegregated football in the South. After the game Bear Bryant brought Sam into the all-white Alabama locker room stood him in front of the team and said, "That, boys, is a football player", and from that point on colleges in the South followed Bryant's lead and began recruiting black athletes.
 
Last edited:
Let's not forget about Moss either (84 in Minneosta to 18 in Oakland).
 
39 is a great number for Maroney. My favorite all-time Patriot wore that number (Sam Cunningham). I'm hoping Maroney brings the same karma.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
39 is a stoopid number! I'm pissed! Maroney needs to wear something in the low 20's or 31,32. Doubt he will change it. Jackson's number is dumb as well. He needs a number in the 80's but if he wants 17, then oh well, whatever he wants.
 
Dont pop a vein.
 
THEARCHIVES said:
39 is a stoopid number! I'm pissed! Maroney needs to wear something in the low 20's or 31,32. Doubt he will change it. Jackson's number is dumb as well. He needs a number in the 80's but if he wants 17, then oh well, whatever he wants.
Don't worry. They'll still look tight! :rocker:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
363839 said:
So Garrett Mills gets a fullbacks number and Jeremy Mincy gets a linebackers number.
Can we conclude that these players WILL be used as the numbers indicate?

Mills was presumed to be our Cooley, and Cooley wears 43. That fits.

I figured Mincey would get a 90 but I'm not sure there are any left. Obviously he's a LB, he's too small for a DE in the 3-4. At least he won't be wearing a 40 like TBC for his first few years.

I'm disappointed they gave away #45 though. That was my man's number.
 
THEARCHIVES said:
39 is a stoopid number! I'm pissed! Maroney needs to wear something in the low 20's or 31,32. Doubt he will change it. Jackson's number is dumb as well. He needs a number in the 80's but if he wants 17, then oh well, whatever he wants.


So, these numbers are LOOSE numbers? Will Maroney be worth 1st round money if he wears a loose number. Jackson, pay him lower for a loose number.

Hey, I'm all for cap savings if they are given loose numbers. Let no player ever be tight again...it's got to be worth at least a 5% cap savings.
 
17 is ok, I don't remember the pats having someone ever in the teens at WR.

39 I like for Mahoney. It is not like all the other RB numbers in the 20s that u see on every single team. It's different and that should be looked at as a good thing. Mahoney will hopefully stay at 39 and not switch numbers like some are speculating.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Keegs said:
17 is ok, I don't remember the pats having someone ever in the teens at WR.
Andre Davis last year (#18).

P.K. Sam in '04 (#14).

Dedric Ward in '03 (#17).

Bad memory, eh?
 
zippo59 said:
39 is garbage.
Really?


FWIW, that's the leading rusher in the history of the Patriots. I think enough time has passed that people are beginning to forget guys like Sam and how great they were. Things were much different then; Cunningham was really a fullback and was equally known as a lead blocker. But he could also turn the corner and take off. He had injury problems through his career, and was out of football entirely in 1980, before returning to play 2 more years. Like a lot of guys, he pretty much was done by the time he reached 30.

It's funny, look how many times Curtis touched the ball in his time with the Pats, in comparison to how few times 'Sam the Bam' did.
 
Last edited:
Hok said:
Andre Davis last year (#18).

P.K. Sam in '04 (#14).

Dedric Ward in '03 (#17).

Bad memory, eh?
damn ur right, i forgot davis. but the other 2 never really played and i was never big on looking up the 7th string wide receiver's number.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MORSE: Looking At Patriots Wide Receiver Room and Gabe Jacas Mess
Key Questions Remain After Patriots Mini Camp: Little Margin For Error at Several Positions
Patriots News 06-14, Patriots Wrap Up Spring Workouts
Patriots Rookie Lomu Reveals “Weird” First Days at Right Tackle
Vrabel’s Goal For Christian Barmore in 2026: “Being able to finish”
MORSE: Day 3 of Patriots Mini-Camp
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference 6/11
MORSE: Day 2 of Patriots Mini-Camp
TRANSCRIPT: Caleb Lomu Media Interview 6/10
TRANSCRIPT: Ashton Grant Press Conference 6/10
Back
Top