?????
A) Owners spend money to make money, not out of the goodness of their hearts.
B) With regard to the rest of your post, please post a reference to where the Redskins (who have no problem getting anyone to buy tickets) charges more than other teams. Last I heard, it was the patriots who charged the most and it was the redskins who haven't had an increase in average ticket price (excluding premium seating) since 2006.
[/QUOTE]
Oh yeah, the FedEx experience is right up there with Gillette.
Ask any Redskins fan about the sign ban, the 9/11 Family Commemorative Redskin T-Shirts the proceeds of which went 100% to Dan Snyder's pockets, the CHARGING OF ADMISSION for fans to watch training camp, the complete lack of security inside and outside the stadium, the ban on tailgates, the ban on media interviewing fans on the grounds of the stadium, the insistence on making player personnel decisions (until this year) .....on and on and on.
Look at ANY list by SI, ESPN, Sporting News, you name it, of the worst owners in sports and you find the same name year after year after year in the top 5. There's a reason why THIS happens every year like clockwork:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/football/nfl/05/08/nfl.owners/index.html
Perhaps in your book that makes him an okeedokee owner. But I live here, I have seen what he has done to a fanbase that is 100 times more loyal and dependent on a team than the New England fanbase will EVER be to the Patriots. Are they suckers? You bet. Is it their fault that they enable this kanker sore of a human being? Yes. Still, people this loyal and this tied to their team deserve not only decent performance but simple everyday RESPECT from the ownership they patronize.
So he hasn't raised ticket prices since 2006. Well so hasn't Peter Angelos of the Baltimore Orioles just up the road. If that's your criteria, then go for it!