- Joined
- Aug 11, 2006
- Messages
- 25,360
- Reaction score
- 10,246
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Moss stated he was unhappy after the first game and the pats never talked to him about a contract extension.Now wat Moss did is childish but management didnt exactly do well in not approaching him.
Even with the loss of Moss the pats still have more weapons than they did in the SB years.
Even with the loss of Moss the pats still have more weapons than they did in the SB years.
On OFFENSE only... so what is the point of pointing that out?
They have a lot of young players on defense who are rookies or just starting to come into their own. Patrick Chung took a huge step forward both in his special teams play and his safety play against Miami.
I think that McCourty is playing extremely well, for a rookie. And I believe that Spikes and Cunningham are ahead of the curve, which is great since they are rookies as well.
This defense is a work in progress and we knew that would be the case entering the season.
If this is true, and I have to assume that it is, the situation was indeed sufficiently toxic that a trade was an absloute necessity.
Outbursts during a game over play-calling and "getting my touches" can't be put up with, period.
Why am i pointing this out? Because ive read hundreds of posts exclaiming 'how are we going to go on, we'll Never make the play offs' Im pointing out that there is prolly more talent on this team offensively than in the SB years.On OFFENSE only... so what is the point of pointing that out?
Tell that to the teams that played against the Pats in 2003 and 2004. The Pats still have at least 2 players who can "stretch the field" in Tate and Hernandez. I can remember the pass to Troy Brown against Miami. I can remember the pass to Deion Branch against Pittsburgh.
Hernandez leads the team in catches over 20 yards. Definitely has the speed to open things up. Edelman has more speed than quickness, but not by much.
The Pats have used more intermediate routes (10-20 yard routes) than they have in recent memory. I think that this will continue. And I think that with the dynamic receivers they have, they can have the kind of success the dink and dunk receivers (Branch/Givens/Brown) did in 2003 and 2004.
The best part is that it still opens up the field for the running game and for the deep threat.
I'm not excusing Favre. He's an INT machine.So, what you are saying is that it's the lack of Rice and Harvin's headaches that are to blame for Favre throwing 6 interceptions and for their running game not being as effective as normal...
Dude, stop. Just stop. Those are excuses and they are BS ones at that.
Im not forgetting that at all, i meant the offense only. While I think this defense will come together by the end of the year it won't be good enough to carry them to the SB. I never thought this was going to be a SB year for us even before Moss was traded.I don't know about that, even so people are forgetting how dominant the defense was during the SB years. The defense now isnt even close to that.
"Outburst was with O'Brien, not Belichick"
Solution? Trade O'Brien.
I'm not excusing Favre. He's an INT machine.
I'm simply suggesting to you that a reason for why the Vikes offense isn't performing up to snuff is because the teams top two receivers are hurting. Kinda tough to blame the play caller for any reduction in offensive performance. Geez, could you just imagine how ole doofus would do if Moss and Welker were hurt ..... good grief!
I think that midway through the season, Moss will realize he has made the worst mistake of his career. Favre is no Brady, and Childress is no BB.
Maybe Moss is a UFA at the end of the season and we resign him with a new attitude!!!
Sounds to me like he was trying his damndest to get traded. It worked out for him.