It's completely mind boggling how you manage to create an argument out of think air and proceed to argue against it. BB has set BJGE's value at $2 mil plus a second round pick. If BB thought he was worth more, he could have tendered him at a higher level, like the Raiders did with Michael Bush. In fact, BB has never made a mistake with a RFA he wanted to keep by tendering less than the market value.
Then along come you, and apparently are in agreement that BJGE is not worth more than the value BB has set on him. Then you proceed to argue against absolutely no one that we shouldn't be paying him $3 mil +. Hey, guess what - nobody is suggesting that we pay him that much. Nobody has offered him that much. Then you proceed to argue against yourself - making up a completely fictitious and overblown (by your own standards) market value for the guy and saying that we shouldn't be paying that.
Great. Good job. Hope you're having fun.
