PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

PSA: Stop Pluralizing BURROWS and other terrible things

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ice_Ice_Brady

where black is the color where none is the number
Joined
Apr 3, 2006
Messages
26,979
Reaction score
53,352
You ****ing morons.

Sean Payton
Peyton Manning

Joe Burrow (not Burrows)

Marcus Peters (not Peter)

Josh McDaniels (not McDaniel)

Bruce Arians (not Arian)

If I see any more of these…

 
Also it's:

"a moot point", not "a mute point"

"Could have"/"Could've" not "Could of". Same for would and should.

It's "I couldn't care less" not "I could care less" which literally conveys the opposite meaning to the one intended

It's "for all intents and purposes" not for "all intensive purposes"
 
Last edited:
Also it's:

"a moot point", not "a mute point"

"Could have"/"Could've" not "Could of". Same for would and should.

It's "I couldn't care less" not "I could care less" which literally conveys the opposite meaning to the one intended

It's "for all intended purposes" not for "all intensive purposes"

"It is a parent that"...should be apparent. Unless the topic is parenting.

"Waiting with baited breathe"...should be bated, as in reduced. Unless you are fishing with your mouth.

"Statue of limitations"...should be statute. Unless this is a reference to the expression of a human condition through sculpture.

"Given free reign"...should be rein, as in horse reins. Unless you have a kingdom to liberate.

"Nip it in the butt"...should be bud, as in a plant. Unless you want to chew on someone's rear end (which none of us want to hear about).

"No holes barred"...should be holds. Let's not go there.
 
It's not "woman", it's "birthing person".........duh

 
Also it's:

"a moot point", not "a mute point"

"Could have"/"Could've" not "Could of". Same for would and should.

It's "I couldn't care less" not "I could care less" which literally conveys the opposite meaning to the one intended

It's "for all intents and purposes" not for "all intensive purposes"
I always thought that "could of" and "could have" can both be used.
 
I always thought that "could of" and "could have" can both be used.
How?

No offense, but surely you know the meaning of 'could' and the meaning of 'of'? How could it make sense to use them together?

I think the confusion comes from could have being abbreviated to could've
 
I'm going to do something evil if I see one more person spell Kyle Dugger's name "Duggar".
 
This is fun!!! Next, let's do song lyrics:

 
This is America we will mispronounce any and all words we will. Now continue to hide in your basement. You don't want to get the Omnicron.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Wolf Cites ‘Untapped Potential’ After Patriots Select Notre Dame Tight End Raridon
Patriots Trade-Up Landed Them a Defensive Menace in Jacas
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Night Two Press Conference 4/24
MORSE: Patriots Don’t Sit Back, Team Trades up to Get Their Guy
TRANSCRIPT: Caleb Lomu’s Interview with New England media 4/23
MORSE: Patriots Make a Questionable Selection of Caleb Lomu in the First Round
Patriots Trade Up, Take Utah Tackle in Round 1 of the NFL Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference 4/23
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Press Conference 4/23
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/23: Vrabel Set to Miss Day 3 of Draft ‘Seeking Counseling’
Back
Top