Grogan14
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2017
- Messages
- 5,286
- Reaction score
- 8,530
100% agree with this. It's a huge PR issue for Goodell and the NFL. They have to be very careful how they handle this and not be perceived as "insensitive" and/or not caring about patient safety.Remember that Roger comes from PR. So he's going to deal with this like a PR issue. I think because of that, Roger is going to do the thing that has the best optics. The number one thing is he can't be seen punishing the Bills (so I think them forfeiting the Bengals game is off the table). I think everything else is on the table. He can declare it cancelled and doesn't count. He can declare it a tie. He can hold it later. He can declare them both winners. And because he comes from PR, he knows that ultimately precedent doesn't matter, because he'll decide the next situation that's even remotely similar in the way that has the best optics then.
This tragedy comes on the heels of the Tua concussion injury and major questions about the sport from a safety perspective in general.
THe short term business considerations are of course important to the owners....BUT I bet the longer term ramifications about player safety and the danger of the sport will be top of mind priority for the NFL.
I suspect the NFL will bend over backwards to accommodate player concerns (as they should) and take a hit with one, two or three teams getting slight playoff seeding disadvantages in terms of favoring player mental health and safety concerns.
If a couple of teams get hosed in a minor way in terms of playoff seeding....too bad..it's a unique situation.
As far as the playoffs go, lets be quite honest...Pats do not deserve to be in the playoffs and would not be if they hadn't added a 7th team. So if Pats or any other team gets a slight scheduling disadvantage...tough luck..move on












