- Joined
- Feb 8, 2005
- Messages
- 43,530
- Reaction score
- 24,121
The D really needs to do something about playing against option qb's. That seems to be BB Achilles heel.
Really? Could you list the other option QBs that BB has faced and had issues with?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The D really needs to do something about playing against option qb's. That seems to be BB Achilles heel.
No you don't! We have done a better job against their d line before. Solder was putrid
I did not get to finish the game, but looking at Cooks TD, it is clear that the ball hit the ground out of bounds. What did review say? I don't hear any noise on an issue I believe should be mentioned?
Idk. They will be tested against better offenses on paper coming up. The bucs and the falcons. Oh boy
The defense definitely has the talent to be fixed.
Winner. Chicken littles please read ^
Ummm, let’s start with this season, Alex Smith?
The defense definitely has the talent to be fixed.
How do you figure? Because I understand that the Patriots O-line had never faced Clowney, Watt, and Mercilus at the same time prior to yesterday? Because I understand that it was THUNEY who got beat for 2 of the 5 sacks? Because I understand that, when it came down to it, the Pats O-line bought Brady enough time to get the job done.
No one said that Solder didn't have a bad game. Unlike you, I can remember other tackles on this team having much worse games.
How many sacks were on Solder? How many on Thuney? Come talk to me when you have a competent answer. OH.. Still waiting for you to answer my question. Or can't you because you don't know?
Well the defense wasn't this terrible to start the season. It's early but they haven't even faced those powerhouse offenses unless you think the chiefs and the Texans are in that league. They're not!
You mean the Bucs team that just got their butts handed to them by Case Keenum?
No you don't! We have done a better job against their d line before. Solder was putrid
How do you figure? Because I understand that the Patriots O-line had never faced Clowney, Watt, and Mercilus at the same time prior to yesterday? Because I understand that it was THUNEY who got beat for 2 of the 5 sacks? Because I understand that, when it came down to it, the Pats O-line bought Brady enough time to get the job done.
No one said that Solder didn't have a bad game. Unlike you, I can remember other tackles on this team having much worse games.
How many sacks were on Solder? How many on Thuney? Come talk to me when you have a competent answer. OH.. Still waiting for you to answer my question. Or can't you because you don't know?
I don't care.I can't stand it!Pats still look terrible considering, let's not sugarcoat it. Defense BLOWS and Oline sucks.
It's mostly communication from what I can tell. I do also believe that these things will be fixed.
Honestly I didn't get to see nearly any of the game which sucks. I did see a few plays and highlights though. I plan to sit down and watch all of it in the next few days though. However my tentitive thoughts are.
The defense needs to do better but I am not overly concerned yet. The effort vs the Saints showed a great deal but this is now 2 games this year when you thought they would hold an offense down and didn't. We need to keep in mind of course that only 26 of those points were scored by the offense and 6 of them were helped by questionable calls. So you could argue really only 20 should count. On the other hand it is not okay to give up points just cause a call doesn't go your way.
This Texans offense has done very little this year. It could be argued the Patriots let a horrible offense run a track meet on them. It could also be argued that NFL offenses don't get held to 10 PPG all year and it was due by the law of averages for that unit to play exceptionally well after 2 very bad showings. Personally I believe the truth is somewhere in the middle of it all (as boring as that sounds). It was probably unreasonable to expect any NFL caliber offense to be held down 3 weeks in a row. We should have expected a great effort and performance from this unit relative to what they are capable of. However I think we went a tad beyond. The Pats defense gave up more than they should. Obviously there are some issues with this unit at all 3 levels. We have seen it 2 of 3 games. It is the norm and not the aberration. So we will probably see it again a few more times but there is plenty of time to fix it. I have no doubt they will.
On offense the OL got beat and not just because Cannon was out. Brady has been under a lot of pressure and taken a lot of his this season. That is not okay. With Edelman gone he may need to hold on to the ball a tic longer and the OL needs to step up. Personally I am not super worried about it on the whole as I think it is not a talent issue and the players are coachable and the coaching is great. Also they have looked below average vs 2 of the best NFL fronts there are and with a key injury. Cooks and Brady are starting to gel a bit more. That will be key without Edelman. IMO the most important play of the game for them was that 2 points conversion. Just like Edelman ran in SB49 and he won just about as decisively. It is plays like that that really get you in with Tom Brady. The bombs are great but that kind of play is key.
The offense with Amendola really works better at this point. He is a key piece that really works well with guys like Cooks and Gronk who get so much attention. Surprised they didn't go to White more this game. Not a big deal just i thought he was more of an every game staple at this point. In any case it is clear this group will be hard to stop. Particularly when the OL improves which i think it will. The 3rd/4th and short game is concerning but it is such a small sample. However I think they may need to rethink their strategy there.
I rarely comment or post, but an analysis by someone who didn't watch the game is priceless.