- Joined
- Dec 18, 2004
- Messages
- 12,790
- Reaction score
- 22,869
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
post 17I am going to have to state the incredibly obvious here. The Patriots were not in Super Bowl 55. Perhaps some here didn't notice that? That was my choice.
I am going to have to state the incredibly obvious here. The Patriots were not in Super Bowl 55. Perhaps some here didn't notice that? That was my choice.
Post 20post 17
You asked a question.Post 20
this is a pointless hypothetical as you can't trade a Super Bowl for another one.
That's an example of why I love the Italian language. It makes fifty-five sound like a song title. I wish I could speak it.55
Cinquantacinque
So the backup long snapper had as much to do with winning the superbowl as brady. Got it. Dude we know you hate Brady and dont think he is ****, I just dont understand why you come over to this forum. You need to learn a statement that was made by a very smart man. Most valuable player does not mean only valuable player. When you figure that out someday maybe you can get off Brady for awhile.none, and why are they Tom Brady super bowls? They were earned by all 53 players and the coaching staff.
So the backup long snapper had as much to do with winning the superbowl as brady. Got it. Dude we know you hate Brady and dont think he is ****, I just dont understand why you come over to this forum. You need to learn a statement that was made by a very smart man. Most valuable player does not mean only valuable player. When you figure that out someday maybe you can get off Brady for awhile.