Patriots Local News:

SOURCE:ProFootballTalk.com


SOURCE:Providence Journal


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:CBS Boston


SOURCE:98.5 The Sports Hub


SOURCE:TheAthletic


SOURCE:Patriots.com


SOURCE:MASSLive


SOURCE:937thefan.radio.com


SOURCE:Pats Pulpit


SOURCE:Yahoo! Sports


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:Pats Pulpit


SOURCE:CBS Boston


SOURCE:Patriots.com


SOURCE:Patriots.com


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:ProFootballTalk.com


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:98.5 The Sports Hub


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston

Patsfans.com

Upcoming Opponent:
Next Up: Dolphins
Sun
Sep 13th

Current Patriots Twitter Feed:

Penalties being considered for the Pats - UPDATED 1/1/2020

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Fatmancryin, Dec 9, 2019.

  1. upstater1

    upstater1 Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    16,826
    Likes Received:
    1,175
    Ratings:
    +5,734
    I didn't say they had permission to film the sideline. I said he might have asked if they had permission to film.
     
  2. Jlaff

    Jlaff Early Bird Specials PatsFans.com Supporter Weekly Picks Winner

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2011
    Messages:
    3,028
    Likes Received:
    582
    Ratings:
    +3,435
    If we want to see Al Davis, we'll need the NFL releasing video of Kraft receiving a handjob as part of the penalty.
     
    • Genius Genius x 1
    • Thank You Thank You x 1
  3. sb1

    sb1 Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2013
    Messages:
    12,418
    Likes Received:
    2,629
    Ratings:
    +14,529
    With the Pats exit and the perception that they’re coming back to the pack now I’m thinking the penalty will be lighter.

    Pats third rounder is a bit higher than it usually is. Might give the NFL some room to lower the pick slot like they did with the Giants instead of taking it if that’s what they had in mind.
     
  4. ohiopatsfan

    ohiopatsfan On the Game Day Roster

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    109
    Ratings:
    +491
    A mid round draft choice plus a hefty fine seem to be in order, especially since the NFL has been unable to link the incident directly to the team, unless "prior bad acts" are used as a reason to increase.
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 5
    • Confused Confused x 1
  5. betterthanthealternative

    betterthanthealternative PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2006
    Messages:
    6,875
    Likes Received:
    1,865
    Ratings:
    +8,366
    There's no legitimate reason to penalize the team for this. It was a casual error made by people unconnected with football ops and had no upside for the team. Stuff like this happens all the time over the course of an NFL season - it has to, there are too many moving parts over the course of a season.

    The real reason this is being made into an issue is that the NFL is in the business of entertainment, as measured by its income, which is indirectly but substantially increased by this kind of attention. If it were Tampa Bay, nobody would care so the NFL wouldn't give it a second thought. But they can make $$ when it's the Pats.

    Trying to measure "the right penalty" as if there is an objective system of justice is a fool's errand.
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  6. sb1

    sb1 Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2013
    Messages:
    12,418
    Likes Received:
    2,629
    Ratings:
    +14,529
    That’s a great point by Reiss.

    Won’t matter though, knowing who we are dealing with here.
     
    • Winner Winner x 4
  7. upstater1

    upstater1 Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    16,826
    Likes Received:
    1,175
    Ratings:
    +5,734
  8. Hammer of Thor

    Hammer of Thor PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    4,134
    Likes Received:
    1,923
    Ratings:
    +10,975
    • Useful Useful x 1
  9. upstater1

    upstater1 Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    16,826
    Likes Received:
    1,175
    Ratings:
    +5,734
  10. upstater1

    upstater1 Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    16,826
    Likes Received:
    1,175
    Ratings:
    +5,734
    In case people aren't aware of the link I just posted, this is what it says: Jets explain presence of camera man on sidelines

     
    • Useful Useful x 2
  11. Hammer of Thor

    Hammer of Thor PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    4,134
    Likes Received:
    1,923
    Ratings:
    +10,975
    But the Jets actually were in compliance with the policy. The Patriots were in the press box (not sidelines) and not in lime green vests and not even at their own game. Purpose was the same, but wasn’t anticipated under that policy. That’s why there is an issue here. Reiss has it right, and that’s why the Pats should get a fine (who knows what will happen....) and the Jets got nothing.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. upstater1

    upstater1 Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    16,826
    Likes Received:
    1,175
    Ratings:
    +5,734
    Well, Reiss wrote that there wasn't a comparable situation. I'd say having your media team, unaffiliated with football ops, filming is a very comparable situation.

    If the main thing that comes out of this is that the Patriots media people weren't wearing proper clothing, then the whole scandal becomes silly.

    Were they hiding? Well, they were in the press box in front of everyone. Did they have permission? From the Browns, yes.

    I bet you that 99% of fans don't even realize the media people are allowed to film if only they wear lime vests.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  13. Hammer of Thor

    Hammer of Thor PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    4,134
    Likes Received:
    1,923
    Ratings:
    +10,975
    You’re focusing on the vests. The point is the policy relates to filming from your own sidelines during your own game. The Jets did everything right so there is no “comparable situation” - they were totally in compliance. This is filming another team’s game (not your own) from the press box (not the sidelines) without the NFL’s permission (because those circumstances aren’t covered under the NFL policy; yes, they had the Browns permission but why not the NFL?). The Patriots film crew having lime green vests still wouldn’t have had them meeting the policy.
     
  14. archstanton543

    archstanton543 In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2014
    Messages:
    2,550
    Likes Received:
    533
    Ratings:
    +4,141
    Because they never had to in the past. This was a documentary on the advance scout who, in the course of his job, looks at the other teams sideline. They wanted to film that to give you an idea of what he's looking at.

    That's like covering the equipment manager and filming B-roll of the team's washing machine.

    They didn't ask the NFL for permission because they assumed (wrongly, mistakenly) that they had permission to film what they were filming.
     
  15. upstater1

    upstater1 Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    16,826
    Likes Received:
    1,175
    Ratings:
    +5,734
    It's the same thing, though. I mean, you can get clearer pictures on the sideline. The press box gives you no advantage at all.

    As for the "not your own game," that's not in the rule.
     
  16. sb1

    sb1 Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2013
    Messages:
    12,418
    Likes Received:
    2,629
    Ratings:
    +14,529
    I’m thinking the decision on a penalty for this will come after the season. The Falcons one was March 30 of that year.

    What may help the Patriots - assuming no link to the football team is found- is the league doesn’t really have a policy of how team video productions are to do their jobs and an outcome of this will be the creation of one. Hard to talk about precedent in the absence of such a policy.
     
  17. The Brandon Five

    The Brandon Five PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    13,591
    Likes Received:
    1,823
    Ratings:
    +8,893
    Can't we just say it was a "mistake" like the Ravens' bluetooth guy standing right behind Harbaugh?
     
  18. Ice_Ice_Brady

    Ice_Ice_Brady PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2006
    Messages:
    15,672
    Likes Received:
    6,291
    Ratings:
    +33,836
    Let’s be real. The Patriots losing and the talk of TB12 leaving will probably lighten the punishment. This has always been about hated and jealousy. I think if the Pats had lost to the Seahawks in the SB, Deflategate investigation and results are very different. This is all about meting out justice to satiate the angry, jealous feelings from other teams owners and fans alike. There isn’t one thing Goodell does that isn’t political.
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
    • Winner Winner x 1
    Last edited: Jan 10, 2020
  19. sb1

    sb1 Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2013
    Messages:
    12,418
    Likes Received:
    2,629
    Ratings:
    +14,529
    We all know what would happen if that was the Patriots.

    Kraft better stand up for this organization if the league goes way over the top again. If he can’t do that then sell it to someone who will.
     
  20. The Brandon Five

    The Brandon Five PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    13,591
    Likes Received:
    1,823
    Ratings:
    +8,893
    We better see some punishment for Bluetoothgate as well.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1

Share This Page

FORUM SEARCH: CLOSE
For searches w/multiple
players add commas
(Ex: "Bill Belichick, Devin McCourty")