ashley
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2014
- Messages
- 19,926
- Reaction score
- 33,922
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.They did it in 2012 i think correct?
NopeIt is 100% crazy.
Agree. You want to rest your starters who need a break but you don't want to lose intentionally to anyone.If the Pats go into Denver and beat a desperate Donkey team in their home stadium, why do we care if they make the playoffs?
Why would we prefer to play Miami to Denver?
So you propose belichick tell his team to lose on purpose and risk losing the 1 seed because they should be afraid of a 6 seed.Nope
read more carefully. I said IF we had the 1 seed locked up already.So you propose belichick tell his team to lose on purpose and risk losing the 1 seed because they should be afraid of a 6 seed.
You can not have ever played competitive sports in your life.
Doesn't matter you still don't throw the game. Professional athletes play with prideread more carefully. I said IF we had the 1 seed locked up already.
I can see why you don't understand the flak
Let's give up HFA in the AFCCG so we can control what team that isn't good enough to get in on their own that we would play assyming that team that isn't good enough to get in would win in round 1 and we are so afraid of them we lose in purpose so we get to play the afccg on the road.
Do you people think before you post?
We did not lose on purpose to buffalo in 2014 to avoid a team because we were afraidWhat @BobDigital is saying is that if we have HFA locked up, then winning Week 17 isn't really necessary. We can rest our starters and use a "loss" to knock out an AFC rival competing for a Wild Card (whether it be the Steelers, Ravens, or Broncos). This is, after all, essentially what we did against the Bills in Week 17 in 14', and that was the season where we ended up winning the Super Bowl!
Aside from that, though, I have no real problem having to play in Oakland (assuming they can even make it past the Divisional Round). We've already lost Gronk. There's no point in exposing our other weapons to injury. We need all hands on deck for this Super Bowl run.
I know this is looking ahead but if things line up right it makes sense.
If the Pats beat Denver this week the best they can do is 10-6 (at 8-5) Pats @ KC Oak
On the other hand Miami is a team we can give a free win to (at 8-5) @ NYJ @ Bills Pats
As long as the first round bye and #1 seed is wrapped before this game there is no reason to want to win it. Also it ups your chances of maybe getting one the Dolphins/Texans/Titans in the divisional round as they are the 6th and 4th seed most likely. I would not be upset about that.
I know this is looking ahead but it is possible depending on how things go this week (A Pats win/Denver loss and Miami win) i think we can force Miami in.
Given that we win the tiebreaker over Kc and lose it to Oakland and they both play after us that is a good chance.there is lot of football left. i suspect we will be playing for HFA vs dolphins.
This of course is tongue in cheek, but I felt like this is what we did last year. Not a good feeling. I doubt BB does it again.I can just see BB now.
Well listen fellas I have thought this through. I am afraid of Pittsburgh, Denver and Baltimore. I know we beat all 3 but pats fans says I should coach so I try to get you easy teams in the playoffs.
So we are going to lose on purpose. If we lose to Miami we could get the chance to play them again instead of those mean bully teams. The whole thing revolves around getting a game against Houston so we don't even have to show up. Yes I am fearing every other team that could make the playoffs.
So trust me. Tank against Miami and pray we get them in round 1. Just remember to pack your bags because I just gave away the afccg at home.
Don't you all agree? The best thing for us to do is be afraid and lose on purpose so there is a chance we don't have to play anyone any good before we lose the afccg.
| 736 | 30K |
| 8 | 678 |
| 7 | 644 |
| 1K | 31K |
| 427 | 22K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 7 - April 22 (Through 26yrs)











