- Joined
- Jun 17, 2000
- Messages
- 31,276
- Reaction score
- 47,905
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I also would have to say that intangibles might be something to also prioritize ahead of natural ability. IE: can you develop someone physically who might have the more important traits (mental toughness, resiliency, etc.). Obviously, we know a late-round guy who had those, and I feel like that might be something to keep in mind as they begin evaluating players. I also wouldn't be surprised to potentially see them select more than one QB this April, including another one of those later round guys.I think it's a bit premature to crown Devito with anything. Lots of guys start hot and then come back to Earth, either through regression to the mean or because DC's now have some real film on them.
Dak has been good, but he also hasn't won anything yet. I think we'd all be thrilled if we had a Dak Prescott instead of the current group, but I'm not sure that's the goal you should be shooting for.
Purdy looks real good, but he's also got a really QB friendly system and GREAT weapons. So that brings up the actual crux of the debate in this tweet: Should you grab a QB as high as you can and build around him? Or should you build a great offense, with a stout OL and great weapons, then get the best QB you can and drop him into the best possible scenario for him to succeed?
More on Pickens:
Sort of a bad sign if he can’t even handle playing for them. Obviously, here - especially this year - would have probably not turned out well.Obviously the Thornton over Pickens selection has turned out poorly for the Patriots, but it's stuff like this that was exactly why that decision wasn't a slam dunk. He had more injuries in college than Thornton, and had as much potential to be Antonio Brown OFF the field as he did being AB ON the field. Always time for him to mature, but I don't think he and Bill would have gotten along, especially in the offensive circumstances of the last two years.
What's sort of interesting was the fact the Steelers supposedly wanted Thornton, which played a role in New England taking him. Have to wonder, given their history, how that might have turned out by comparison given their success developing skill players.Obviously the Thornton over Pickens selection has turned out poorly for the Patriots, but it's stuff like this that was exactly why that decision wasn't a slam dunk. He had more injuries in college than Thornton, and had as much potential to be Antonio Brown OFF the field as he did being AB ON the field. Always time for him to mature, but I don't think he and Bill would have gotten along, especially in the offensive circumstances of the last two years.
| 19 | 2K |
| 16 | 451 |
| 11 | 504 |
| 2 | 261 |
| 185 | 22K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 20 - May 5 (Through 26yrs)











