BradyManny
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2006
- Messages
- 11,103
- Reaction score
- 1,520
#17! No! The Chad Jackson reunion isn't occurring...
Seriously though, it's Wednesday, it looks like we are not adding anyone at WR for this postseason run and will go in with the ridicolously thin group we have. I can only hope this means that we will ditch the spread (at least with WR personnel) and never see more than 2 WR in the game at once. Honestly, given our personnel, that is going to be our most effective group - and it will be an effective one. We have some explosive weapons on offense, its just that they (Faulk, Watson, etc.) are not wideouts. And we can use that to our advantage to dictate the defensive personnel, and then adapt to either run or pass based on the look.
Seriously though, it's Wednesday, it looks like we are not adding anyone at WR for this postseason run and will go in with the ridicolously thin group we have. I can only hope this means that we will ditch the spread (at least with WR personnel) and never see more than 2 WR in the game at once. Honestly, given our personnel, that is going to be our most effective group - and it will be an effective one. We have some explosive weapons on offense, its just that they (Faulk, Watson, etc.) are not wideouts. And we can use that to our advantage to dictate the defensive personnel, and then adapt to either run or pass based on the look.