Patriots Local News:

SOURCE:CBS Boston


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:Bleacher Report


SOURCE:ESPN Boston


SOURCE:98.5 The Sports Hub


SOURCE:TheAthletic


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:NBC Sports Boston


SOURCE:sportingnews.com


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:USA TODAY


SOURCE:Forbes


SOURCE:Bleacher Report


SOURCE:Bleacher Report


SOURCE:USA TODAY


SOURCE:USA TODAY


SOURCE:TheAthletic


SOURCE:TheAthletic

Patsfans.com

Upcoming Opponent:
Next Up: N/A

Current Patriots Twitter Feed:

Patriots | Arbitrator dismisses Branch's grievance

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Chris, Sep 7, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. patsox23

    patsox23 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    7,428
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +63
    I hope you're right.
     
  2. patchick

    patchick Moderatrix Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    15,136
    Likes Received:
    3,629
    Ratings:
    +13,981
    I think people are assuming that he has the Jason Chayut Red Phone.
     
  3. PATSNUTme

    PATSNUTme Paranoid Homer ex-moderator PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2005
    Messages:
    15,134
    Likes Received:
    463
    Ratings:
    +1,540
    Here is somethng that Borges does have right and he inadvertantly mentioned it.

    The NFL does not want this thing to go the distance. They don't want this to be a precident

    I think that before next Saturday they will try to force a deal on both the Patriots and Branch. I only hope that they do not force a deal with the Jests for reasons that I've stated a few times before. But, I just want Branch gone.

    God forgive me for posting on another Branch thread. He's already dead to me.
     
  4. Hoodie

    Hoodie In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    Messages:
    2,602
    Likes Received:
    532
    Ratings:
    +2,188
    Thanks. It just fascinates me that the two stories could be SO different. I'm inclined to believe ESPN because they don't have the anti-Patriot bias that Wrong has.
     
  5. Oswlek

    Oswlek Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    9,078
    Likes Received:
    1,519
    Ratings:
    +7,081
    Maybe not, but he certainly has his blue balls. :rolleyes:

    On second thought, maybe they aren't so blue. :eek:
     
  6. SBPatsFan

    SBPatsFan On the Roster

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2006
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +21
    Mortenson and Borges articles cannot be reconciled. Mortenson clearly states Feerick "dismissed a grievance filed by the NFL Players Association..." Borges claims the issues has been delayed "...[Feerick] will likely not hear arguments on that issue until after Burbank rules on Branch’s second claim."

    It will be interesting to discover whose sources were accurate and who made a mistake. I guess we won't know until one of the two revises their article.
     
  7. Hoodie

    Hoodie In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    Messages:
    2,602
    Likes Received:
    532
    Ratings:
    +2,188
    Not to get off topic here but Wrong Bogus apparently on TV accused the Pats of not giving into Branch's demands because they are racists. (I guess he forgot about Richard Seymour) so the reference maybe in bad taste but it's kind of relevant.
     
  8. Slagathor

    Slagathor 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,551
    Likes Received:
    35
    Ratings:
    +208
    That's not how I understood it at all.

    The NFL had argued that this arbitrator either had no right or qualification to hear the grievance. The arbitrator decided that he does have the right to here the grievance, but will postpone the hearing. Probably until after the other hearing with the MASTER is heard and ruled on first.

    ......................................................................or I could be wrong.
     
  9. SBPatsFan

    SBPatsFan On the Roster

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2006
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +21
    ESPN changed its story. Borges appears to be correct and it is on hold.
     
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2006
  10. Va_Pats_Fan

    Va_Pats_Fan Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,433
    Likes Received:
    102
    Ratings:
    +403
  11. Oswlek

    Oswlek Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    9,078
    Likes Received:
    1,519
    Ratings:
    +7,081
    Of course they are racist. Absolutely no way they would ever sign a black player like say Roosevelt Colvin or Rodney Harison. Hell, the next time they draft an African-American in the first round will be the first.
     
  12. bakes781

    bakes781 In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Messages:
    3,068
    Likes Received:
    102
    Ratings:
    +212
    oh great that's the last time I trust ESPN. :rolleyes:
     
  13. RayClay

    RayClay Hall of Fame Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    26,958
    Likes Received:
    2,795
    Ratings:
    +11,771
    nm...........
     
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2006
  14. patchick

    patchick Moderatrix Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    15,136
    Likes Received:
    3,629
    Ratings:
    +13,981
    Everybody knows they're sizist. Colvin, Seymour and Brady are all much taller than Branch and Vinatieri. Oh, and Big Willie shrank.
     
  15. Oswlek

    Oswlek Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    9,078
    Likes Received:
    1,519
    Ratings:
    +7,081
    Yeah, how else would Hill have lasted this long on the roster. :confused: ;)
     
  16. PromisedLand

    PromisedLand Virtual Internet Person

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    3,364
    Likes Received:
    14
    Ratings:
    +39
    ESPN's story now says "Arbitrator John Feerick of Fordham Law School has reserved judgment on a grievance filed by the NFL Players Association on behalf of Patriots hold-out wide receiver Deion Branch, NFLPA sources told ESPN's Chris Mortensen on Thursday."

    I'm no legal expert but it sounds to me like the arbitrator is saying he is not going to rule on the grievance at this time but is reserving the right to decide on it later.

    Note that the Mortenson's source for this report is "NFLPA sources" so it perhaps should be taken with a grain of salt.
     
  17. patsacolachick

    patsacolachick Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Messages:
    503
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    Oh i can't stand it that WRONG was right, that has totally ruined my "hooray football starts tonight!" mood :mad:
     
  18. Box_O_Rocks

    Box_O_Rocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    Messages:
    20,536
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +25
    I followed a link posted earlier in the thread and note that the ESPN story is evolving....My apologies to Ian and ESPN for posting the earlier version and the update in their entirety to document how the story has changed.

    The earlier version comes up when you use ESPN's print formatting option - the updated story apparently hadn't been linked to "print" when I read it.

    This is the link to the update: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2577984 Pats1 had it in his post: http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/showpost.php?p=180979&postcount=16
    Here is the updated version, it seems the arbitration is postponed until after the Special Master hears the second grievance.
    Reading various stories about the grievance, there was speculation that Branch's camp was using the result of the first grievance to create a case for themselves in the second, with this reversed I wonder how that affects their second grievance...
     
  19. patchick

    patchick Moderatrix Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    15,136
    Likes Received:
    3,629
    Ratings:
    +13,981
    This would make sense if he felt that this claim were dependent on the claim being heard by the special master--e.g. if the grievance would only make sense if the team were judged guilty of negotiating in bad faith. My uninformed guess is this ruling is a mild positive for the Patriots.
     
  20. PromisedLand

    PromisedLand Virtual Internet Person

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    3,364
    Likes Received:
    14
    Ratings:
    +39
    I believe that's exactly what he is saying.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

FORUM SEARCH: CLOSE
For searches w/multiple
players add commas
(Ex: "Bill Belichick, Devin McCourty")