I don't see how the Pats could possibly sign him to a contract more favorable than the one he had given all the teams trying to outdo each other for handing out stupid contracts to corners, so I would think it unlikely he returns.
I don't see how the Pats could possibly sign him to a contract more favorable than the one he had given all the teams trying to outdo each other for handing out stupid contracts to corners, so I would think it unlikely he returns.
I agree. I have to imagine the Pats are preparing to move on without him. Too bad, I liked what he brought. He stabilized the Super Bowl by moving over to Matthews. No one else in our secondary had the height to match up with him.
I agree. I have to imagine the Pats are preparing to move on without him. Too bad, I liked what he brought. He stabilized the Super Bowl by moving over to Matthews. No one else in our secondary had the height to match up with him.
I agree. I liked him a lot. I can see them moving on, but I wish it meant Revis was back, but that seems like it may not be the case per Schefter. I think Browner + what we have would've been enough. But now we're going to need at least 1 new starting CB.
I know that the reasoning to all of these moves will be revealed eventually, but for now...consider me to be absolutely, phucking flummoxed at this point.
I'm not too upset about this(predicted this might happen last summer). I didn't think that Browner was that great. I think he was severely overrated by fans because he hits very hard. Those players tend to get very overrated.
Not saying that I didn't like what he brought. But I think he's extremely dependant on having a great #1 cb and great FS. But he was a very nice tool to have when opponents had a tall physical receiver. But people saying they rather have Browner than Revis are crazy(yes I've seen people here say that). Revis is so much better that it's not even close. He can cover every type of receiver, Browner is pretty limited to big guys where he is good.