Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Froob, Aug 7, 2018.
Goose: "This shirt is moister than that shirt, but that shirt is wetter than this shirt."
This is a good debate.
Goose Bar be cue, ladies and laddies!!
I shouldn't have engaged it. Now look what I did
Null set instead of 'nuff said.
Goose: "This crayon is greener than that one. But that crayon's more blueish-yellow."
Goose: "This building's taller than that one...But that one's higher."
I love me some Goose Barbecue!!
Mmm...tastes like chicken!!
'ts been fun. Thanks!!
But do you think Rodgers is better than Brady?
No. But I'm a Pats fan.
Edited to change no because I misread the question
Rice had a better career, obviously, with decent production even beyond age 40, and career numbers that are just crazy.
Moss at his peak was better, but his peak was not sustained anywhere nearly as long.
better over a career? Rice
better for winning one play, one game, or one season at his very best? Moss
So I think the answer is Rice, but it depends on your time frame.
I’m going to start trolling Packers fans by saying Favre was better, this season.
I farded and then shidded.
A couple of points with respect to that.
Rice led the nfl in receptions twice, receiving yards 6 times and TDs 6 times. Moss was 0/0/5.
I guess it depends on your QB and offense. I think that Moss would be a better choice for most of the top quarterbacks in the league over the last decade.
I know I started this thread, but I feel like Moss is closer to TO than he is Rice. Is that wild to say? These guys are probably 1-3 all time.
Do you mean skillset wise or ranking wise?
Separate names with a comma.