He’s also failed to beat his rival in numerous attempts which happens to be the main reason why he was brought in, so there’s that, too. This sounds like the same argument that people use against the Pats.
I’m so damned sick of the “me too” movement, I can’t even explain. Now, we have the first case of someone who was “me too’ed,” but somehow indirectly. Think about that. Meyer is guilty of knowing that someone on the staff had been in a marital wrestling match, which at some point occurs in the majority of marriages? Give me a break. When did everyone’s private lives become the responsibility of someone else?
Yes, it is wrong. He should’ve interfered with the marriage and put his assistant on blast the first time he heard the rumors. I’m not meaning to downplay that fact, but let’s keep everything in perspective at the same time. There’s even texts amongst the wives stating that “Urban doesn’t know what to believe.” He’s not a freaking court of law. He’s pretty much the definition of a victim of circumstance who didn’t wish to get involved. Eventually, he decided to report it, after he gave the assistant the benefit of the doubt and the situation did not change. While that was wrong, let’s not pretend like he’s Satan’s spawn, either.
I made my post somewhat in jest but apparently it wasn't taken as such. Given that, I'm happy to match your sincere tone.
The entire first paragraph is irrelevant. You seem to be assuming I'm a Michigan fan which is hardly the truth. My dad is an alumni so I grew up watching games but I have little attachment to Michigan myself. This Meyer situation has absolutely nothing to do with football so I don't understand why you'd bring up anything football-related in this discussion.
This is about an individual who was aware that a member of his coaching staff had abused his wife in 2009, and then subsequently became aware of additional alleged abuse that occurred in 2015, did nothing to address the matter and publicly lied about his knowledge. Calling this a "marital wrestling match" is beyond disingenuous, and if you think a husband physically abusing his wife on multiple occasions is a normal occurrence in marriage, I'd say that your moral compass needs some tuning.
No one asked Meyer to interfere in their marriage, nor did anyone ask Meyer to act as a "court of law". Rather, they expected him to take domestic abuse allegations seriously (knowing that there were previous incidents between this couple). Meyer seemingly did not. And all that aside, Meyer lied about his knowledge of the events. Is it unreasonable to expect Meyer to not outright lie? Could he not have said,
"I was aware of the 2015 allegations and allowed law enforcement to handle that situation in a way they saw fit, but I and the University did not feel the need to intervene"?
If you, or I, or anyone is aware of someone being abused (or allegedly abused), publicly or private, we have a moral and ethical responsibility to address the matter. Meyer did not. Regardless of whether Meyer was genuinely concerned about Smith's wife and was unsure of the truth value of the allegations, Meyer (and his wife, given that she's an OSU employee) had a responsibility both ethically and legally (via Title IX) to report those allegations. Given that Meyer was aware of the previous abuse that Smith had committed in 2009, Meyer should have been on top of the 2015 situation immediately, and unfortunately he was not.
That's why Meyer is being (rightfully) vilified.