- Joined
- Nov 14, 2006
- Messages
- 52,910
- Reaction score
- 33,922
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.There's a few weird cases recently where guys agree to terms with their team on a new deal but still hold a grudge against them that the deal was somehow not "good enough". Dude, nobody forced you to sign that deal... you could've gone to free agency and taken a better offer if you're so sure you would've received one...My biggest issue is the fact he makes a "business decision" with his body rather than gutting it out when his team is still in the mix for the postseason. That's not the guy you want leading your football team. He had a hamstring issue, not a knee issue and could have wrapped it and been conservative as a pocket passer while handing the ball off. It still would have been a better option than the route they were forced to go.
I think he's also still sour that the Ravens didn't cave and pay him after the Browns set that ridiculous precedent with Watson, which no other team in the league should ever do to begin with.
How does the Baltimore Sun writer (and Colin Cowhered) think Miami is supposed to fit Lamar Jackson's contract into their salary cap?
Tua Tagovailoa's cap numbers:
2026: $56.4 million, $54 million guaranteed
Lamar Jackson's base salary:
2026: $51.25 million
2027: $51.25 million
Both teams would have so much dead money it wouldn't be worth it to either one.
And Miami would have so much money dedicated to QB, they couldn't field a decent team around Jackson - so what would be the point?
Todd Monken is a very good OC. I’d argue that Lamar hamstrings him more than helps him.Not gonna happen.
The entire Raven offense has been designed around Jackson. That's not just the design of it, but the personnel as well. So you'd have to not only change the QB, you have to change the OC, and the kind of receivers you have. That would require a 2-3 year reset assuming you find a good starting QB.
Sounds like you have a 2 time MVP QB who at $36MM/yr is a positive bargain. who has a bit of an attitude problem or rather a personality issue. But is basically a good guy who is going through a very frustrating and disappointing year. They will deal with it and will probably be a favorite next year to win it all. The Ravens are my MOST hated team. I wish them nothing but the worst, so I hope they DO trade Jackson
How does the Baltimore Sun writer (and Colin Cowhered) think Miami is supposed to fit Lamar Jackson's contract into their salary cap?
Tua Tagovailoa's cap numbers:
2026: $56.4 million, $54 million guaranteed
Lamar Jackson's base salary:
2026: $51.25 million
2027: $51.25 million
Both teams would have so much dead money it wouldn't be worth it to either one.
And Miami would have so much money dedicated to QB, they couldn't field a decent team around Jackson - so what would be the point?
Tua Tagovailoa Contract Details, Salary Cap Charges, Bonus Money, and Contract History | Over The Cap
Tua Tagovailoa contract and salary cap details, including signing bonus, guaranteed salary, dead money, roster bonuses, and contract historyoverthecap.com
Lamar Jackson Contract Details, Salary Cap Charges, Bonus Money, and Contract History | Over The Cap
Lamar Jackson contract and salary cap details, including signing bonus, guaranteed salary, dead money, roster bonuses, and contract historyoverthecap.com
Lamar has a no-trade clause, so the Ravens can't exactly "take calls" on him unless he permits them to.
If he does allow that, his contract is pretty trade-able. Baltimore saves some cap space, and the acquiring team can easily convert his massive 2026 salary into a signing bonus + extension, making the initial couple years fairly affordable.
because it WOULD have been a horrible mistake to draft him at that point. The Ravens committed themselves to creating an offense SPECIFICALLY designed to Jackson's skillset. The have never allowed him to run a standard WC or EP offense. Were you going to cut Brady and throw away that 6th superbowl to draft Jackson or waste the pick and sit him for 2 years while the GOAT was playing.How many posters I had to fight saying taking Lamar in 2018 would've been a horrible mistake.
| 10 | 797 |
| 13 | 654 |
| 47 | 4K |
| 39 | 4K |
| 7 | 768 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 7 - April 22 (Through 26yrs)










