- Joined
- Oct 10, 2004
- Messages
- 33,218
- Reaction score
- 44,411
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Ridiculous defecation on the spirit of the game of football...agree/disagree?
I don't have a problem with it because it's within the rules but because it's Harbaby, I do have a problem with his hypocrisy.
I don't have a problem with it because it's within the rules but because it's Harbaby, I do have a problem with his hypocrisy.
The hypocrisy, in general, is annoying. If this were the Pats, you'd see players, fans, writers, commentators, etc. claiming the Patriots were bending the rules and "cheating" yet again. The league would also change the rules in the off-season to make it illegal.
Fouts is so, so bad.On a Side note: How clueless were the commentators? Holy crapola man
"Holding probably will be called" ??????
Fouts: "The Bengals will get another play" You clueless Douche.
Fouts wasn't really acting in "the water boy". Was he?Fouts is so, so bad.
Only thing I took out of that video is how absolutely pathetic and spineless the Bengals are. I saw a number of Bengal players not just being held, but were in headlocks. And they did put up a fight. No pushing, no shoving, no yelling. I expect a Marvin Lewis team to be treated like a red headed step child, but have a little pride. With the Bengals finally having a losing season, they may actually be a contender next season if ownership finally smartens up and get rids of Lewis.
As for the intentional safety, smart play. Using the rules for your benefit. And I agree, if the PAts did it there would be an uproar today.
On a Side note: How clueless were the commentators? Holy crapola man
"Holding probably will be called" ??????
Fouts: "The Bengals will get another play" You clueless Douche.