- Joined
- Feb 4, 2018
- Messages
- 15,885
- Reaction score
- 20,297
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.This is where we gather to follow things on Game Day. Obviously, emotions tend to be high so if anyone gets a little crazy, the use of the “Mute” button is encouraged on anyone who may be annoying to you to control your experience and to allow the moderators to also enjoy the game.
At the same time, please take a deep breath before over-reacting for the sake of making this a pleasant experience for everyone.
He is referring to only passing but you are right the stats don’t support his assertion. I am surprised because neither Agholor nor Smith has been the deep threat I had imagined they would be.Lazar is wrong with his assertion.
Pats are 11th in passing plays over 20 yards. One less than the Chiefs and more than the Jills, Chargers, Colts and Titans
Pats are 9th in running plays over 20 yards. Colts are #1 but Pats are ahead of Titans, Bucs, Chiefs, Bengals, Chargers and Rams.
Is it the factor of long ball in flight travel (aka vertical pass plays) or "speed" of the WRs (did you see Hill just break that 5 yard in cut into a TD) that you think causes your surprise? Or some other aspect?I am surprised because neither Agholor nor Smith has been the deep threat I had imagined they would be.
You have a point. I think we have no WR as talented as Diggs, and Mac lacks Allen’s arm so I think the Bills ought to have more big plays but they do not. We don’t have WRs you would describe as big playmakers but they do make plays. Let’s see if they can do it Sunday.Is it the factor of long ball in flight travel (aka vertical pass plays) or "speed" of the WRs (did you see Hill just break that 5 yard in cut into a TD) that you think causes your surprise? Or some other aspect?
One of the things Patriots fans tend to gloss over is that fundamental execution can be just as important to "explosiveness" as raw talent. Raw talent is obviously necessary, but on the wide spectrum of that talent (player A is faster, player B is stronger, player C is quicker....) adding in execution across the entirety of that talent pool (for example good downfield blocking) can result in explosive plays just like simply "outrunning that other guy".
I'm not surprised because historically that's what the Patriots teams have done. They've executed well even when they didn't have the MOST talented (of the talented) at every position.
I've never thought of Agholor a deep threat really but more of an intermediate guy. He certainly had some long bombs in OAK last year but that seems to be an anomaly.He is referring to only passing but you are right the stats don’t support his assertion. I am surprised because neither Agholor nor Smith has been the deep threat I had imagined they would be.
Yup we bought high on both Agholor and Smith but my expectations were optimistic.I've never thought of Agholor a deep threat really but more of an intermediate guy. He certainly had some long bombs in OAK last year but that seems to be an anomaly.
Agholor has speed but when I think of a deep threat I think of a player who consistently get behind a defense, creates separation and actually catches the ball.Yup we bought high on both Agholor and Smith but my expectations were optimistic.
Yeah he got behind the coverage in Philly but couldn’t catch the ball. His hands look fine to me but I’m not seeing the speed we know he has. Maybe he gets open and Mac doesn’t throw it.Agholor has speed but when I think of a deep threat I think of a player who consistently get behind a defense, creates separation and actually catches the ball.
Agholor did it somewhat consistently one year in OAK. Philly fans will tell you what I said above.
Lazar is wrong with his assertion.
Pats are 11th in passing plays over 20 yards. One less than the Chiefs and more than the Jills, Chargers, Colts and Titans
Pats are 9th in running plays over 20 yards. Colts are #1 but Pats are ahead of Titans, Bucs, Chiefs, Bengals, Chargers and Rams.
He is referring to only passing but you are right the stats don’t support his assertion. I am surprised because neither Agholor nor Smith has been the deep threat I had imagined they would be.
I would guess Agholar is backAnother head scratcher from this coaching staff. More Harry on Sunday? Looking forward to him helping the team lose another game...
real vertical element in the offense
I think the elevation limits reset for the playoffs. But they have open slots right?"Two players can be promoted to the active roster on game days. They then return to the practice squad unless the team offers a one-year deal. But teams can't activate a player more than twice; after the second time, they must decide whether to promote him to the active roster."
To clarify. Standard/COVID elevations automatically revert; it's in the CBA. To elevate a player beyond those, they actually must sign the player to the 53.
You did a much better job of arguing the point than Lazar did.Lazar explained today that the 20+ yard stat doesn’t really tell the story, because what he’s referring to is a real vertical element in the offense. And I don’t think he’s wrong. We get plenty of 20+ gains, but a lot of them may come on say a 15 yard dig and 7 yards of yac, a 17 yard over and 4 yards of yac, a screen pass, etc.
These are a different level of “explosiveness” in an offense, although they’re certainly effective. Apparently we’re much lower in rankings of 30+ yard gains, which are more likely to be more vertical routes.
I have the perception that Agholor does run deep routes and draw some coverage, but we really haven’t been able to hit verticals the way we previously had with cooks, gronk, hogan, maybe lafell a bit iirc, obviously moss.
I do think it’s a missing element, or at least one I’d like to improve upon next year. I think we expected more completed deep balls to Agholor. I still hope that comes next year. If teams feel the need to play a safety over the top and have him commit to bracketing Agholor, those intermediate routes to jakobi and Bourne look a whole lot easier.
Unfortunately, that dime to Wilkerson on Sunday was a great chance to hit a deep ball…
Pats rank 13th at passes 40+ yards.Lazar explained today that the 20+ yard stat doesn’t really tell the story, because what he’s referring to is a real vertical element in the offense. And I don’t think he’s wrong. We get plenty of 20+ gains, but a lot of them may come on say a 15 yard dig and 7 yards of yac, a 17 yard over and 4 yards of yac, a screen pass, etc.
These are a different level of “explosiveness” in an offense, although they’re certainly effective. Apparently we’re much lower in rankings of 30+ yard gains, which are more likely to be more vertical routes.
I have the perception that Agholor does run deep routes and draw some coverage, but we really haven’t been able to hit verticals the way we previously had with cooks, gronk, hogan, maybe lafell a bit iirc, obviously moss.
I do think it’s a missing element, or at least one I’d like to improve upon next year. I think we expected more completed deep balls to Agholor. I still hope that comes next year. If teams feel the need to play a safety over the top and have him commit to bracketing Agholor, those intermediate routes to jakobi and Bourne look a whole lot easier.
Unfortunately, that dime to Wilkerson on Sunday was a great chance to hit a deep ball…
Yep.Pats rank 13th at passes 40+ yards.
NFL.com | Official Site of the National Football League
The official source for NFL news, video highlights, fantasy football, game-day coverage, schedules, stats, scores and more.www.nfl.com