FirstAndGoal
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2006
- Messages
- 2,435
- Reaction score
- 1,654
I think the one strange part is he never question the NFL about their authority or precedence or equipment violation or anything . It was all about their sham investigation. While this exposed the NFL for their lies, maybe he is doing it so that his ruling if made against brady reflects he is only upholding the cba but believes nothing else.
Maybe this will come in the 19th hearing .
That's what I fear. He's throwing out red meat and showing what a shoddy operation it was but I'm suspicious until he starts digging into that because that is what is at the heart of this. What I can't tell is whether he's getting at something that undercuts the entire "authority" issue by these early questions.
The judge hasn't begun to show his hand yet.