Nah, the first play hit Thornton in bounds and he didn't get both feet down. We see plays like this all the time and it is the WR's responsibility to drag the foot.
And the second play Thornton is running a seam route with no one around him or between him and the endzone. He slowed down on the route when he should have kept running and caught that in stride. Thornton was wrong on that play. Jones read the play right. Thornton read it wrong.
Since I think I was the guy who started the Brown "bad look" thing, I found the conversation interesting in that it focused on two lines of thought. There was the "Brown sucks" category, and the "it's not his fault" group. Pretty standard stuff these days.
But I found the Thornton clip VERY interesting. What I saw last year was a receiver who ran a blazing 4.2 at the combine and for the entire season I saw only ONE example of him using that speed and that was a RUNNING play (for a TD)
Now as a former coach who NEVER actually coached receivers in individual groups, I saw a couple of things from that clip that I would like to see him vastly improve on this TC.
1. In the first clip, besides getting his feet down, he also rounded his route. In an ideal situation you want the receiver not just make a straight cut to the sideline, you want him coming BACK to the ball a bit. In this clip Thornton starts to make his cut but you can see him make the cut at the 41 and catch the ball at the 43. He wasted 2 steps rounding his break. He DID do a good job slanting inside for a possible cross to set up his break, but his footwork was sloppy. Again in an ideal world you want him to make his cut at the 41 and catch it at the 40 coming back toward the QB
The other point I would make to him would be to get off the LOS quicker. Compare him to whoever was in the slot getting off the LOS. I would remind him he's a 4.2 guy EVERY day and he's got to look like one. He can't stutter step off the LOS when he doesn't have anyone on him. EXPLODE off the LOS (BTW the other boundary receiver was also a bit slow of the LOS, but whomever he was he was MUCH quicker into his route (the crossing one once he did get going). Everything Thornton did on this route made me feel like he was THINKING too much about what he was supposed to do, rather than just "running" it. If you know what I mean.
The 2nd clip, again you see useless stutter steps for a guy who is clearly NOT in any tight man technique and then kind of wanders into the seam as opposed to doing it purposely getting into the hole in the coverage.
My guess is part of the problem lies with the fact he played in that REALLY wide open passing offense down in Baylor down in the big 12 where EVERYONE throws for 400 yds each game, and the kind of strict disciplined route running the Pats use, is VERY new to him. Now it also didn't help that he missed significant time and the hundreds of reps he missed while he was out. (not to mention the coaching mess) AND he was a ROOKIE and all the problems that comes with moving up a significant level.
What I HOPE to see, when I go to TC are these 2 main things. Is he quicker off the LOS. Are his cuts explosive and purposeful. Of course I also what to see what he does against tight man coverage. Is he getting off the LOS and beating it. Hopefully he added a few pounds of muscle and has benefitted from his very meh first season.
And FINALLY as to Troy Brown, he is a coach, and a coach is going to be subject to criticism. It is simply a part of the job. Coaching is ALWAYS going to be a results operation. There are NO excuses. Your players execute or they don't (actually sometimes there really ARE excuses, but that's really not in the job description) Coaches ARE teachers, and it REALLY really fun to teach this sport regardless of the level. But you know going in that when things are going well, it is ALL about the players. And when things go bad, it is YOUR fault and you work to get better. To figure out what you have to do you make your players better. Is it different drills? Is it HOW you are explaining it to them? OR is it something else that will make it easier for your players to be better. Obviously there is not one way to do it. All your players are individuals who respond differently to the message you are trying to get across. BUT when you have a group that starts to ALL pull together and they get rewarded for all that hard work with a win, there is NO better environment to be a part of.
.....AND I am rambling again,