- Joined
- Apr 23, 2008
- Messages
- 17,870
- Reaction score
- 8,909
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Tony Romo is funny.
If Romo could find any sort of consistency and drop his best a little and improve on his worst a little he'd be a handy QB. To me, that suggests it's mental with Romo.I agree. He's so bad there's just not another level of negative adjectives one can use. Funny is good.
If Romo could find any sort of consistency and drop his best a little and improve on his worst a little he'd be a handy QB. To me, that suggests it's mental with Romo.
If it hasn't happened by now it's never going to happen. Something about an old dog and new tricks...Then he'd be somewhere between Alex Smith and Flacco at his best. But that's a BIG IF.
Definitely a choke artist. How often do these type of QB's ever recover from that though?
And that's the game, now I have to find something to do for an hour, lol...
Is it just me or are Schwartz and Garrett the same head coach?
Terrible time managment, players not knowimng their assignments, plays coming in late on a consistent basis.
They are just awful to watch.
I do wonder about their protection schemes. Similar to Chicago, I'm not sure Romo or Cutler make the correct adjustments for their lines. It makes you marvel at the adjustments by P.Manning and Brady.I actually feel sorry for Romo: No run game without Murrary, WRs who do everything they can at times to mess it up and if anything goes wrong it's going to be put on him (as well as the HC).
They may be a top 10 D and O, but they give up some huge plays on both sides.