NFL Network caught lying [Not a lie, but a misleading statistic]

[patsfanfromoversea]

PFF is just like any other rating site that uses subjective humans to determine the success or failure on a play to determine if a player succeeded or not on a given play. Those people can sometimes only guess, given they don't know the calls, the assignments, or the rules that only those on the team would know.

These sites are good INDICATORS of how a player is doing on individual basis. I think they are fair to use by fans in promoting an OPINION of how a player is doing or in a comparison of one player or another. But please remember they are fallible and not PROOF of an opinion,

i agree, i always liked them because they give you ratings for different areas for example pass blocking and run blocking grade
This is for fans always useful as an indication because they can rarely judge how the O-Linemen peforms in certain areas ( just position example)
I like that especially for LOS play but obv it is really hard to judge, but when someone posts it, everybody should be on the same page that this person is certainly not stating this rating as a fact or sth like that

 

[PScottman]

I've never been sacked, my entire life.

We apologise for the fault in the
subtitles. Those responsible have been
sacked.




Mynd you, møøse bites Kan be pretty nasti...



We apologise again for the fault in the
subtitles. Those responsible for sacking
the people who have just been sacked,
have been sacked.

 

[jays52]

You just know someone here is going to fact check you on that...right?

Fact Checkers say this is mostly false. "While called Mac, his legal first name is actually Michael. This poster should be deplatformed and sued."

 

[203Pat]

Lol this thread. Any reason to complain apparently.

 

[StanleyGrogan]

We apologise for the fault in the
subtitles. Those responsible have been
sacked.




Mynd you, møøse bites Kan be pretty nasti...



We apologise again for the fault in the
subtitles. Those responsible for sacking
the people who have just been sacked,
have been sacked.

A Møøse once bit my sister...

 

[Family]

It should be based on # of snaps. J Jones has taken 54%.

Is that enough?

I've always thought it funny in baseball where a player doesn't qualify for at few bats in batting title, but if he had those appearances and struck out, the player will still have the highest average.

 

[venecol]

Not a good look if Pats 4th round rookie has the best coverage grade after all that doom and gloom about not paying Jackson and Gilmore.

You should sue them. Who knows, if you get a few here to join you, maybe a class action?