Maybe I had under-rated Brady that year, but I find it hard to accept that he was over-rated that year. I don't think Brady was great that year, but I don't recall anyone claiming he was either.
He was managing the game, the team was winning with him, but I don't think anyone was proclaiming him to be the GOAT. So I didn't think he was overhyped at all.
I mean you mention the 3 total TDs in the playoffs, but that's not far off from his 18 in 14 regular season games either. It's not like he had a dramatically different playoffs. He was good, not great in the regular season, similar in the playoffs.
But if there was one area that kind of showed what his greatest strength was, it was in the close games. He was 4-1 in the regular season in one-possession games, the only loss coming to the Rams. And sure enough, he went 3-0 (with a hand from Bledsoe) in one-possession games in the playoffs. This was a huge difference from Bledsoe, who went 3-9 in one-possession games in 2000, and 0-2 to start 2001. The team started winning those close games with him.
And looking at the raw TD totals doesn't tell the whole story. That snow game against the Raiders was an incredible performance, but his 0 passing TDs don't tell that. Rich Gannon led a top-5 offense into that game and they threw for less than 160 yards and 13 points. Part of that was the D, but part of that was the conditions. And in those same conditions, Brady is slinging 52 passes for 312 yards. He had the pick, Gannon had an early TD, but Brady played a great game there.
So he obviously wasn't the GOAT that year, but he was incredible and exceeded all reasonable expectations after Drew went down. We weren't counting on him becoming a Pro Bowl QB or an MVP that season. And he was neither of those things in 2001. But he still did way more than any of us had any right to expect.