BradfordPatsFan
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- May 7, 2006
- Messages
- 2,545
- Reaction score
- 20
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I have to admit that I haven't followed the case very closely other than its broad outlines to the effect that CW believes he was endangered by the actions (or lack thereof) of his doctors after his surgery. Does anyone on the Board have a reasonably objective view on the merits of his case?
Charlies basic claim is that they didn't tell him all the risks (which is iffy at best, they usually do) and that they knew he had internal bleeding and did nothing until he was almost dead (better cause than the first).
I can see how the judge had no recourse but to declare a mistrail, the two doctors accused of malpractice, helping to save the life of a juror.
I mean Charlies has plenty-o-money now, but I guess if he doesn't proceed his lawyers would sue him for not letting them sue the doctors.
Well, now they can get Brady on the stand under oath and throw some baby questions at him
Charlies basic claim is that they didn't tell him all the risks (which is iffy at best, they usually do) and that they knew he had internal bleeding and did nothing until he was almost dead (better cause than the first).
I can see how the judge had no recourse but to declare a mistrail, the two doctors accused of malpractice, helping to save the life of a juror.
I mean Charlies has plenty-o-money now, but I guess if he doesn't proceed his lawyers would sue him for not letting them sue the doctors.
Charlies basic claim is that they didn't tell him all the risks (which is iffy at best, they usually do) and that they knew he had internal bleeding and did nothing until he was almost dead (better cause than the first).
I can see how the judge had no recourse but to declare a mistrail, the two doctors accused of malpractice, helping to save the life of a juror.
I mean Charlies has plenty-o-money now, but I guess if he doesn't proceed his lawyers would sue him for not letting them sue the doctors.
In this day and age you need to sign 10 or so pages for wart removal so the Doctors can cover there butts. You can't tell be Charlie wasn't aware of the risks. I also believe he had a problem with a contractor and he refused to pay him. Seems to me it is a risky business to enter into contract with Charlie Weiss. He needs to stay out of the buffet line, his a-s looks just as big now as it did in the pre-surgery days.
Risks are one thing...malpractice due to a screw up is quite another.....
Well, now they can get Brady on the stand under oath and throw some baby questions at him