HEY BRO! WHAT UP?
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2006
- Messages
- 4,362
- Reaction score
- 1
Somebody deleted my original post so lets try again.
You're the one to talk.Debating him is useless. Easy way to elevate the coversation- debate a brick wall.
Oh, really?The draft is there to improve the team not get players.
I excluded 2007. You might want to re-read my original post.Will someone explain how in 2007, a 2nd and 4th were not a good deal for Moss and Welker? Still you see people talk about how the Pats got nobody in 2007.
Dumbest comment ever. News flash....the Pats started losing core players in 2005. In the last five years their still trying to replace Seymour, Harrison, Bruschi, Ted Johnson, McGinest, Law, Samuel, Vrabel, and you can even add Colvin in the mix. The Pats could've started to try to replace these guys slowly but waited until 2008. Now they're scrambling to find the answer with these last two drafts.BB is smart for not drafting if the value is there. Stockpiling picks in the early years means more players drafted when your core guys come to their end. It's amazing how we have so many picks at the exact time the team needed to be turned over.
And the Pats have? You might be the biggest homer on this board.Look at the Steelers' defense. Almost all the starters are well north of 30. Try replacing that over two years.
Last edited: