not only does KC have the refs/NFL in their back pocket, but they don’t have to deal with
- Manning IND/DEN teams
- the BAL teams
- the PIT teams. NE always had their number, but most of those teams were really damn good against everyone else
- the 2006-2009 SD teams, specifically the 2006 and 2007 teams. those rosters were insanely stacked with talent
all of those teams, at their best versions, would be the best or second best team in the AFC for the past few years
It was quite shocking the 2001 Raiders lost 3 straight to end the season. That team most likely would've ended the Pats Cinderella season had their been clear skies that day in the divisional round. Also, had the Raiders been a little younger, they would've been a nuisance during the first dynasty.
Even if you took Merriman off steroids, I agree that their roster was arguably the best in the NFL between 2006-2007. The problem was Rivers<Manning/Brady.
I agree that while the Pats had Pittsburgh's number, their early teams were really good and watching in real time didn't know how it would turn out. Starting in 2007 was when you could confidently say they were no match for NE.
Colts were an absolute pain in the ass and a team I dreaded the Pats facing. Pats had the upper hand in 2003 and 2004, but the tide quickly turned in the Colts favor with the 2005's beatdown on MNF and sweeping the Pats in 2006. They had Manning, James, Harrison, Wayne and Clark on offense. On defense, they had Freeney, Mathis and Sanders. Lots of potential HOF's there.
Baltimore had their star players like Reed, the guy who killed someone, Ngata, Suggs and Rice but a lot of their rosters were filled with trash. It was bizarre how they gave the Pats so much trouble.
The Pats were facing teams with future HOF's while the Chiefs continually face teams with fringe players.