PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Lombardi: The Jets want Brandon Marshall

Status
Not open for further replies.
According to the rule of 8, the Jets cannot trade for a player they wouldn't be able to sign normally via free agency. My understanding is that the only way they'd be able to trade for Marshall is if they first lost a player of similar value..



As for Lombardi talking about it, umm.. maybe because he's been out of the loop for awhile and this wasn't in previous CBAs..

I'm telling you that you are wrong, but ok whatever you want to believe. You're right.
 
I know it's a year removed, but I feel at the WR position it takes a good year to build rapport with your QB. IMO Marshall would be the guy that solves that issue.

We don't need 2 top-level talents (with large contracts) on the roster in 2010 though. So if they drafted Moss' replacement this year (or Tate turned out to be it), then they'd still get at least a year with Brady before 2011 of which Moss' future is unknown.
 
Yeah, I just started following the patriots because I figured it would be so much fun to watch all these horrid drafts, and wasted picks.

I'm not trying to be a ****, but I'm getting a little sick of all the condescending posts by some of these supposed "pats fans".

This is no longer 2001-2006, and defenses have caught up. If you think fielding second rate WR's is going to cut it I think you're wrong. Moss was a risk when they brought him in. That appears to have worked out ok. When he leaves at the end of the year there is no one to take his place. I know it's a year removed, but I feel at the WR position it takes a good year to build rapport with your QB. IMO Marshall would be the guy that solves that issue.

Except that Marshall is under NO requirement to sign an extension with the Pats. All he'd have to do is sign his tender and show up to play. And guess what? A new CBA would make him an unrestricted free agent. And the Pats would have to use the Franchise Tag on him. Do you really think the Pats want to have to do that? And that is even if the Franchise tag is in the new CBA..

As for what you are getting sick of. I'm sick of people thinking that someone like Marshall will magically fix all the problems of the Patriots offense. You totally ignored the issues I brought up about Marshall. TOTALLY. Yet they are issues that were there LAST YEAR.

And, honestly, I don't see the Pats giving the guy a 4 year deal with everything that's been going on with him. They are more than likely to give him a 1+ prove it contract, which is something that Marshall isn't likely to go for. Then what?
 
According to the rule of 8, the Jets cannot trade for a player they wouldn't be able to sign normally via free agency. My understanding is that the only way they'd be able to trade for Marshall is if they first lost a player of similar value..



As for Lombardi talking about it, umm.. maybe because he's been out of the loop for awhile and this wasn't in previous CBAs..

I -think- the trade rule is about UFA, preventing a team from sign-trade to get around the limitations of UFA's top 8 teams are allowed to sign.
 
We don't need 2 top-level talents (with large contracts) on the roster in 2010 though. So if they drafted Moss' replacement this year (or Tate turned out to be it), then they'd still get at least a year with Brady before 2011 of which Moss' future is unknown.

That's fine. I just don't agree. With 2010 being an uncapped year I see no problem paying high salaries to 2 WR's seeing one is gone after next year anyway.
 
According to the rule of 8, the Jets cannot trade for a player they wouldn't be able to sign normally via free agency. My understanding is that the only way they'd be able to trade for Marshall is if they first lost a player of similar value..



As for Lombardi talking about it, umm.. maybe because he's been out of the loop for awhile and this wasn't in previous CBAs..

I thought the rule of 8 affected unrestricted free agents. Marshall is a restricted free agent.
 
I'm telling you that you are wrong, but ok whatever you want to believe. You're right.

Fine. Provide the CBA link that says otherwise. Because this was discussed, Ad nauseum, over the past 3 months. By people on this board who have actually READ the CBA parts that are pertinent to the discussion.
 
That's fine. I just don't agree. With 2010 being an uncapped year I see no problem paying high salaries to 2 WR's seeing one is gone after next year anyway.

You may see no reason not to spend high as a fan, but that doesn't mean there isn't a valid reason to operate with fiscal responsibility and stick to a proven model.
 
I thought the rule of 8 affected unrestricted free agents. Marshall is a restricted free agent.

My understanding was that it affected BOTH. To limit their ability of sign/trade type things. If I'm wrong, I'll readily admit it. But only when shown supporting evidence.
 
Fine. Provide the CBA link that says otherwise. Because this was discussed, Ad nauseum, over the past 3 months. By people on this board who have actually READ the CBA parts that are pertinent to the discussion.

I'm sure someone will provide the link (I'm too lazy) but if I recall correctly the rule states that a top 8 team cannot trade for a UFA that they would otherwise be unable to sign due to the provisions in the article. It's a rule so that another team can't sign and then trade a player to a top-8 team that couldn't sign that UFA otherwise (due to the other top-8 rules regarding UFA's). Basically just closing a potential loophole regarding obtaining a UFA
 
Last edited:
Re: Lombardi...The Jets want Brandon Marshall

It has been reported numerous places that his height has been inflated and he is really only about 6 feet.

=====================================================

Sure, I have read those reports.

The NFL Combine says Sanchez is 6'2 1/8", and that my friend is the end of the story.
 
My understanding was that it affected BOTH. To limit their ability of sign/trade type things. If I'm wrong, I'll readily admit it. But only when shown supporting evidence.

Go back a couple of pages in this thread someone posted it.

page 21
 
Last edited:
Re: Lombardi...The Jets want Brandon Marshall

Not sure, but in case you haven't noticed they are probably considered the favorites to win it this year.........
No, I haven't noticed this. Where did you see it?
 
Except that Marshall is under NO requirement to sign an extension with the Pats. All he'd have to do is sign his tender and show up to play. And guess what? A new CBA would make him an unrestricted free agent. And the Pats would have to use the Franchise Tag on him. Do you really think the Pats want to have to do that? And that is even if the Franchise tag is in the new CBA..

As for what you are getting sick of. I'm sick of people thinking that someone like Marshall will magically fix all the problems of the Patriots offense. You totally ignored the issues I brought up about Marshall. TOTALLY. Yet they are issues that were there LAST YEAR.

And, honestly, I don't see the Pats giving the guy a 4 year deal with everything that's been going on with him. They are more than likely to give him a 1+ prove it contract, which is something that Marshall isn't likely to go for. Then what?

First, if the Patriots signed him to an offer sheet they determine the length of the contract, and he agrees then signs. I agree it's a long shot at best for BB to offer the years that it would take to get him here, but if they are serious about bringing him here they have to roll the dice and sign him to at least a 4 year deal.

As far as the issues you brought up with BM. I'd say alot if not all that will be cured with a new contract. That's all he wanted last year, and the Broncos weren't willing to do it. Once a team shows they are willing to commit to him long term for fair pay, IMO he'll reciprocate the favor. I am well aware of the risk involved, but sometimes some players warrant that risk. Hell, we could at the very least bring him in for a visit and talk with him. What would that hurt?
 
I thought the rule of 8 affected unrestricted free agents. Marshall is a restricted free agent.

That was my interpretation also. No UFA can be signed unless one is lost of similar value, nothing to do with RFA's or trades.

I think we can safely assume that what has been reported about the Jets and their desire to deal for Marshall are all safe indications that they can pull this off if they can put something together to make our little friend Josh happy.

That aside, again, and let me ask you DaBruinz this time before I repost that crickets picture again due to no one having any response to my simple question of what the Pats should actually do to stay up with the top 5 teams in the conference.

Assuming the Pats continue to sit on their arse as other teams bring in Marshall and TO, knowing we don't have a damn TE or even a decent ground game to rely on. Who is the answer to Moss on the other side of the field?, please tell me. I am giving you the GM hat DaBruinz, tell me your plan if you don't want these ax murderers anywhere near the lockerroom.

And one other thing, now that Vince has his kid's college education expenses well in hand and Mrs. Vince is happy, don't you think Vince will monitor the lockeroom with an iron fist. If he so much as sees one joint being rolled by this rotten apple Marshall in the lockerroom, don't you think he'll address it ? Isn't that part of what we've paid him to do ?
 
Go back a couple of pages in this thread someone posted it.

page 21


No. Someone did not post it. They posted what was in a news article. I asked you for the CBA link.
 
No. Someone did not post it. They posted what was in a news article. I asked you for the CBA link.

How bout you find it then since you're having such a difficult time believing it.

They talk about the restrictions repeatedly on nfln. I'm sure if they were wrong they would have corrected it by now.
 
Last edited:
First, if the Patriots signed him to an offer sheet they determine the length of the contract, and he agrees then signs. I agree it's a long shot at best for BB to offer the years that it would take to get him here, but if they are serious about bringing him here they have to roll the dice and sign him to at least a 4 year deal.

The Pats are more likely to make a trade for his rights than to sign him to an offer sheet. Much like they did with Welker. And that wouldn't happen before they'd already hashed out a deal. As I said, the issues with Marshall extend well beyond the on field attitude and his contract.

As far as the issues you brought up with BM. I'd say alot if not all that will be cured with a new contract. That's all he wanted last year, and the Broncos weren't willing to do it. Once a team shows they are willing to commit to him long term for fair pay, IMO he'll reciprocate the favor. I am well aware of the risk involved, but sometimes some players warrant that risk. Hell, we could at the very least bring him in for a visit and talk with him. What would that hurt?

What do you base your opinion on regarding Marshall? I ask because the biggest red flags coming out of college on him were his attitude, his off-field issues, and his issues with authority.
 
The Pats are more likely to make a trade for his rights than to sign him to an offer sheet. Much like they did with Welker. And that wouldn't happen before they'd already hashed out a deal. As I said, the issues with Marshall extend well beyond the on field attitude and his contract.



What do you base your opinion on regarding Marshall? I ask because the biggest red flags coming out of college on him were his attitude, his off-field issues, and his issues with authority.

I guess it's just a gut feeling.
 
That was my interpretation also. No UFA can be signed unless one is lost of similar value, nothing to do with RFA's or trades.

I think we can safely assume that what has been reported about the Jets and their desire to deal for Marshall are all safe indications that they can pull this off if they can put something together to make our little friend Josh happy.

That aside, again, and let me ask you DaBruinz this time before I repost that crickets picture again due to no one having any response to my simple question of what the Pats should actually do to stay up with the top 5 teams in the conference.

Assuming the Pats continue to sit on their arse as other teams bring in Marshall and TO, knowing we don't have a damn TE or even a decent ground game to rely on. Who is the answer to Moss on the other side of the field?, please tell me. I am giving you the GM hat DaBruinz, tell me your plan if you don't want these ax murderers anywhere near the lockerroom.

And one other thing, now that Vince has his kid's college education expenses well in hand and Mrs. Vince is happy, don't you think Vince will monitor the lockeroom with an iron fist. If he so much as sees one joint being rolled by this rotten apple Marshall in the lockerroom, don't you think he'll address it ? Isn't that part of what we've paid him to do ?

Looks like it's time for the crickets.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Former Patriots Super Bowl MVP Set to Announce Pick During Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel’s Media Statement on Tuesday 4/21
MORSE: What Will the Patriots Do in the Draft?
MORSE: Patriots Prospects and 30 Visits
Patriots News 04-19, Countdown To Draft Day
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 6 – A Week Before the Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/13
Patriots News 04-12, What To Watch For In The NFL Draft
MORSE: Pre-Draft Patriots News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
Mark Morse
2 weeks ago
Back
Top