You mean besides the AFC South?
Why should he be different from every other coach, especially when most people are questioning his personnel/GM moves rather than his actual coaching?
It's certainly comparable to bring up the AFC South with the situation of the Indy Colts, as that was just about the only one that I could think of; but that said, the division itself hasn't exactly been too challenging to them, has it? But giving credit where it's due, you are right as the Colts have won as many division titles as we have here. But in all fairness, when you go back to the Patriot playoff appearances in the mid to late 90's (AFCE), the Indy Colts were nowhere to be found.
Where the Colts have obviously failed is the SB appearances, and most notably and recently, they've shown the world that they were nothing more than a
one-man show the whole time. That is something that Belichick proved was quite the opposite here when Brady went down.
As far as questioning belichick, I've already said that I have no problem with that...but not to this degree. To have to deal with all of this recent scrutiny is in my opinion, unfair. As we know, you certainly disagree, and are more than entitled to your respected opinion/thoughts.
If you would agree that a man of his proven caliber and record should be put through the ringer so often and in such an extreme fashion, then so be it.
