- Joined
- Sep 10, 2006
- Messages
- 16,816
- Reaction score
- 35,170
I am in the camp that booing is a fan's right.
Me too! It's also my right to think people who boo their own team are pricks.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I am in the camp that booing is a fan's right.
Borges: Extra prep time pays dividends as Patriots start to look familiar | Boston Herald
Borges excerpt:
While Borges is accurate about the booing early and cheering late, as an objective observation, I don't get the comment "Of course, paying customers are seldom realistic."
As if the act of buying a ticket makes someone unrealistic, Borges comes off as an arrogant lout because he is always realistic and is so omniscient he never has to pay for a thing. Of course.
What, precisely, is the point of backhanding the 60,000 people who pay the freight?
In Borges' mind, it must be that the great unwashed, who somehow have the wherewithal to pony up between $125 to $300 per ticket, are unable to discern what is transpiring on the field. The reporters and suits in the boxes who sit silently know best, and in time will enlighten those who dig deep to attend a game. Of course.
Borges is a poor reporter. Somewhere along the way he came to believe that just reporting the facts is never enough. If he just said that attendees were restless early and delighted late, and let us draw our own conclusions about the atmosphere, that would have been plenty.
Instead he has to demean the fans which, in a subtle and insidious way, renders their (our) opinion inaccurate about the game, him and his reports. The great ones take pains to describe in detail the facts and trust their readers to draw their own conclusions.
Borges chooses to insult us and preach from his self-appointed position of flawless insight. Of course!
IMO he's just saying fans who boo a group of rookies on a unit which has been decimated substantially this season, yet is gelling and moving forward, are overreacting, and I agree. And he's also saying that fans who applaud their improved execution are overreacting as well, for the same reasons; I don't agree here but can see why he argues that. Not everyone does. And I know most of you guys get all the above too. I'm just sayin...
Me too! It's also my right to think people who boo their own team are pricks.
Personally, when it comes to rights, I think one of two things is true: I think either we have unlimited rights, or we have no rights at all. Personally, I lean toward unlimited rights - I feel, for instance, I have the right to do anything I please. But, if I do something you don't like, I think you have the right to kill me. So where you gonna find a fairer f****** deal than that? So the next time some f***** says to you, "I have a right to my opinion," you say, "Oh yeah? Well, I have a right to my opinion, and my opinion is that you have no right to your opinion." Then shoot the f*** and walk away!
Much as I hate Borges he wasn't ragging on the Patriots he was ragging on the fans who attend the games and i hate to say it but he is actually right this time. The Patriots may well have the lamest crowds in the NFL. There is more noise at a high school field hockey game than those crowds produce, it's embarrassing, and the booing in the first quarter made them look like morons.
The booing was actually the loudest that the crowd was all game on TV. I suspect if the boos come in clearly, the cheers should too. But, uh, yeah, uh, there's an open end in the stadium and all that junk. It's "not conducive for crowd noise". Nevermind that Qwest Field has something very similar and just set a world record for decibel levels.
Ron Borges and another ad nauseum rehash of booing and cheering (or lack thereof). Just what I need!!
(NOT)
I've noticed over the last 20 years that booing* occurs almost exclusively early in the season. I theorize two reasons for this: the team is still gelling and prone to miscues, and you get literally more of a fair-weather crowd. By the time it gets cold, the stadium is full of diehards and the team is more in sync.
Regardless, the booing last Sunday was a very light smattering when the offense stalled early.
* Booing is adult voice given to inner-child tantrum.
Just checking, can i say ****tail but not ****tail party?
Apparently that is the case. That's really odd.
Just checking, can i say ****tail but not ****tail party?
Apparently that is the case. That's really odd.
The vBulletin software filter can indeed be odd sometimes.
It will actually filter out the last name of the film director of the movies Psycho and The Birds too.
On the other hand you can get around it by using ò, ó, õ or 0 instead of the letter o.
The booing was actually the loudest that the crowd was all game on TV. I suspect if the boos come in clearly, the cheers should too. But, uh, yeah, uh, there's an open end in the stadium and all that junk. It's "not conducive for crowd noise". Nevermind that Qwest Field has something very similar and just set a world record for decibel levels.
Really? I thought that there were quite a few 3rd downs that had a lot more volume than the low boos in the 1st quarter.
Though, I watch the game on a surround sound system with a sub-woofer.
I wonder if the people complaining about crowd noise have their tv turned down
| 43 | 3K |
| 2 | 558 |
| 11 | 562 |
| 427 | 22K |
| 8 | 2K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











