- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 58,986
- Reaction score
- 12,773
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Here you go. Even NextGen says it was the wrong decision to kick. And not by a little bit.
Here you go. Even NextGen says it was the wrong decision to kick. And not by a little bit.
He had the range. The ball didn't land short in the end zone. It just wasn't accurate.These kind of metrics don’t mean much imo. For example- FG probability for who? Folk doesn’t have the range. Should have gone for it.
Boo boo how dare u change your mindAt the time I thought a 56 yarder was too far for Folk, especially in the rain. After more thought, I think it was the right call, he had the distance, inches away. Pats were 2-8 on 3rd down and OL is horrible.
Even if he makes it brady marches down field for an easy field goal!He had the range. The ball didn't land short in the end zone. It just wasn't accurate.
No, it still would have been a poor decision. Folk would have simply bailed him out with a great kick.This will be fodder for the inane sportstalk radio today and this week. To think if the kick was about 8" to the left there would be no discussion. Then will come the equally stupid commentary has BB lost it and is unable to make decisions or other such nonsense.
This was the right call...
luckily I have town sewer and don't know the answer to that...
Here you go. Even NextGen says it was the wrong decision to kick. And not by a little bit.
That's a huge stat, something I wasn't aware of until this morning...makes a big difference.Pats were 2-9 converting 3rd downs. Chances for Folk to make that field goal was at least 30%
Im sorry, but It doesnt.That's a huge stat, something I wasn't aware of until this morning...makes a big difference.