Again Ivan? The EP as an outdated offense whine is getting thin to me at least. Most of the so-called new wave of the modern RPO and motion offenses come right out of the 1920's-40's single wing concepts. Often what was considered "old fashioned" comes back in style
Josh is a PROVEN OC who failed miserably as a HC. Being a great HC has little to do with being a great X's and O's guy. It certainly doesn't hurt. Just look at Dan Campbell. He's been a great HC in Detroit because of the culture he's built, in Detroit, not for his game plans. Credit him for hiring Glenn and Johnson and it will be interesting to see how he does without them.
But here's the thing. It seems ironic that Campbell also started his first season with a 3-win season, but he was allowed to build his program, and they improved to 9-8 in 22, and followed up with 2 division titles and a NFCG over the last 2 season as the Lions have been one of the top teams in the NFC. You never know that a guy who was considered a clown in his first year a HC actually CAN turn it around if given a chance, but that is just rambling, let's get back to why Josh is as good a choice that's out there.
The second major complaint that irritates me in this thread is the whine that It wasn't Josh to give us our great offenses of the 2000's and 2010's it was only because of Tom Brady. You know who would be the first to tell you that line of thinking is total BS? Tom Brady. That's who. The Pat's have had only 1 elite WR during the 20 yr. Dynasty, and that was the 2 years we had with Randy. The only other so called elite receiver we had during that time was Gronk, a TE. Yet over the 15 odd years that Josh was the OC or QB coach, the Pats were a top 10 offense a least 10 times and probably closer to a dozen.
I"m aware it doesn't hurt when you QB is the GOAT, but Josh was right there as Brady made the transition from being a "game manager" to the All pro and superstar he became. People keep on forgetting that in no other team sport does a player rely on so many others to have individual success even if it's at the most important position on the offense. So, the Brady acolytes have made it seem like he was the SOLE reason for the success of the Pats over the first 2 decades of the 2000's. But I digress. Bottom line: there is a strong possibility that for at least the next 5 years that Maye will have an experienced and proven voice in his ear, BTW- I wouldn't hate it if they brought back AVP as QB coach because he clearly did a great job with both Maye and Milton's early development, and it would add to the continuity in Maye's development. But I'm not going to go nuts if he isn't brought back
thanks for listening, Ivan